My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7994
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:15:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7994
Author
Duff, D. A., Tech. Ed.
Title
Conservation Assessment For Inland Cutthroat Trout, Distribution, Status and Habitat Management Implications.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Two planning meetings associated with the assessment were held prior to completion of the ques- <br />tionnaires. The first meeting involved individuals knowledgeable with the Snake River drainage; the <br />second meeting involved individuals with specific knowledge of the Yellowstone River drainage. At <br />these meetings the basic purpose of the assessment was discussed and the questionnaires were <br />refined. Projected time frames for completion of questionnaires were also identified. In addition to <br />information derived from the questionnaires, attempts were made to secure and validate historical <br />information which made reference to occurrence of cutthroat trout. <br /> <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Several reports have alluded to the current status of Yellowstone cutthroat trout and other native <br />trauts in the west (Hanzel 1959; Behnke and Zam 1976; Hadley 1984; Thurow at at 1988; Varley and <br />Gresswe1l1988; Behnke 1979 and 1992). In a number of these appraisals (Behnke 1979 and 1992; <br />Varley and GressweIl1988), Yellowstone cutthroat trout were viewed as doing surprisingly well when <br />compared to other cutthroat subspecies. Behnke's (1979 and 1992) assessments were associated <br />mainly with biomass within Yellowstone National Park and the headwaters of the Yellowstone River <br />and not to distribution or preservation of diversity. Varley and Gresswell (1988) provided a quasi- <br />quantitative assessment of current Yellowstone cutthroat trout status (85% occupancy of native lake <br />environments; 10% occupancy of original stream habitat) but they provided no information on how <br />the quantification was derived. Nor did they elaborate on how they arrived at their statements related <br />to success, especially for riverine populations. Thurow et at (1988) provided an assessment of <br />cutthroat trout status within the Idaho portion of the Snake River drainage but again the assessment <br />was largely qualitative in nature. Within Montana, Hadley (1984) prepared a status report for Montana <br />Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks utilizing Yellowstone cutthroat information available in the <br />state's computerized database. Hadley's summary assessment projected an 8 percent occupancy <br />rate for pure strain Yellowstone cutthroat trout in the Yellowstone River drainage. <br /> <br />This status assessment is intended to be an extension of these earlier efforts. Current information is <br />based on conditions occurring within the entire range of Yellowstone cutthroat, including the finespot- <br />ted form that occupies a portion of the Snake River drainage. To facilitate reporting and discussion <br />of the status information, findings will be presented by State and to some extent by National Forest. <br /> <br />Idaho <br /> <br />The assessment area within Idaho included the Snake River drainage from Shoshone Falls upstream <br />to the border between Idaho and Wyoming. Included within this area was the mainstem Snake River, <br />the major tributaries and numerous smaller tributary streams. Three National Forests (Sawtooth, <br />Caribou and Targhee NF's) occur within portions of this area. In total, twenty one (21) sub-basin areas <br />(Table 1) were established and a questionnaire for each was completed. The mainstem Snake River, <br />between Shoshone Falls and the confluence of the Henry's Fork and the South Fork of the Snake <br />(also referred to as the Snake River) was divided into two sub-basin units; one section of stream <br />between Shoshone Falls and American Falls and another section between American Falls to the <br />confluence of the Henry's Fork and the South Fork Snake River. In addition, several of the major <br />tributary drainages, within this section of the Snake River (Goose Creek, Raft River, Bannock Creek, <br />Portneuf River, Blackfoot River and Willow Creek) were treated as separate analysis units. The <br />Henry's Fork of the Snake River was divided into a section upstream from the confluence with the <br />South Fork of the Snake to the town of St. Anthony along with another section extending from St. <br />Anthony to Henry's Lake. Within this portion of the drainage several major tributaries (Teton River, <br />Falls River, Warm River, Buffalo River) were identified as separate sub-basins as was the drainage <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.