Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ORIGINS AND TAXONOMIC THEORY <br /> <br />While it is not the intent of this HCA to provide detailed documentation of phylogeny and prehistoric <br />zoogeography of Yellowstone cutthroat trout, it is important to review theory represented in the most <br />recent work on native western trout (Behnke 1992). For an indepth discussion of the genesis of native <br />western trout, including Yellowstone cutthroat trout, the reader should refer directly to Behnke's <br />monograph. Phylogenetic and zoogeography theory supports the concept that, while evolutionary <br />sequences leading to present cutthroat trout species and subspecies originated in the mid- <br />Pleistocene era (more than a million years ago), most historical and prehistorical distributions were <br />determined by events occurring in the last glacial and post-glacial periods (about 70,000 years ago <br />to the present, Behnke 1992). For the purpose of this assessment, reference to the prehistoric status <br />addresses conditions existing before the presence of white expiorers (prior to 1800 AD) within the <br />Yellowstone cutthroat distributional area (Figure 1.). Reference to the historic status addresses <br />conditions occurring during and subsequent to the exploration and settlement of the western Rocky <br />Mountains by early white explorers (after 1800). <br /> <br />Yellowstone cutthroat trout became isolated in the headwaters of the Snake River following creation <br />of Shoshone Falls (between 30,000 and 60,000 years ago) and in two distinct areas of the lower <br />Columbia River basin (Waha Lake, Idaho and Crab Creek, Washington)(Behnke 1979 and 1992). <br />Behnke (1992) also presents the most logical method of movement between the Snake River and <br />Yellowstone River drainages following the last glacial period (about 8,000 years ago). This headwater <br />transfer allowed for movement and expansion of Yellowstone cutthroat trout into suitable habitats <br />east of the Continental divide within the Yellowstone River drainage (Behnke 1979 and 1992). <br /> <br />During the period of time associated with historic exploration and settlement (1800 to 1900) of the <br />West, cutthroat trout could be found in essentially the entire Snake River drainage above Shoshone <br />Falls to the headwaters located within the Teton Wilderness area of Bridger-Teton National Forest and <br />Yellowstone National Park (Rollins 1935; Jordon 1891; Evermann 1891; Gilbert and Evermann 1894). <br />Even though the earliest explorations were linked to the fur trade, many diaries associated with these <br />expeditions mentioned fish and specifically trout (Trotter and Bisson 1988). Robert Stuart, an early <br />explorer of the upper Snake River in 1812, maintained a diary which mentioned eating trout taken from <br />Marsh Creek, South Fork of the Snake and the Hoback River (Rollins, 1935). During the late 1800's, <br />several scientific expeditions directed by the U.S. Fish Commission, focused attention on fishery <br />conditions existing within the upper Snake and Yellowstone River basins. Both the Jordan (1889) <br />expedition and the Evermann expedition (1891) visited portions of the upper Snake River drainage. <br />The Gilbert and Evermann expedition, of 1892 and 1893, not only returned to sites within the upper <br />portion of the Snake River drainage, they visited the Snake River between Shoshone Falls and Idaho <br />Falls, including three tributary streams in that vicinity. Although not mentioned by early naturalists, <br />the Snake River and its tributaries associated with Jackson Lake along with the mainstem Snake River <br />and most tributaries downstream to the present Palisades Reservoir supported cutthroat having a <br />unique spotting pattern characterized by a profusion of very small spots covering most of the body. <br />They are referred to as "finespotted Snake River Cutthroat trout" and have the potential to represent <br />a separate subspecies (Behnke 1979). Continued genetic comparison (Loudenslager and Kitchin <br />1979; Leary et a!. 1987; Allendorf and Leary 1988) of the two cutthroat forms has not provided <br />definitive proof that would lead to total acceptance that the "finespotted Snake River cutthroat" is <br />indeed a separate subspecies. The fact that most early naturalists (David Starr Jordan being the <br />exception) did not acknowledge the presence of the "finespotted" cutthroat form on their visits to the <br />Snake River above Jackson Lake and within the Two Ocean Pass area is somewhat surprising given <br />the tendency of the time to classify organisms based on outward appearance. The spotting pattern <br />that is so noticeable at present was either inadvertently overlooked or deemed not important. Jordan <br />(1891) acknowledges a difference in spot size and pattern between fish in Heart Lake (upper Snake <br /> <br />12 <br />