Laserfiche WebLink
More attention to the selenium issue came in <br />1997, when the Colorado State Water Quality Control <br />Commission revised chronic aquatic-life criterion for <br />dissolved selenium from 17 µg/L to 5 µg/L. Imple- <br />mentation of the 5-gg/L standard for the Gunnison <br />River Basin meant that the Uncompahgre River and <br />the lower Gunnison River (downstream from the <br />Uncompahgre River to the mouth), along with some <br />other water bodies in the lower Gunnison River Basin, <br />were out of compliance for selenium. Temporary <br />modifications were put in place for the affected water <br />bodies to allow time for measures to be taken at the <br />local level to address the selenium issue. A local initia- <br />tive began in 1998, with formation of the Gunnison <br />Basin Selenium Task Force (Task Force). The Task <br />Force is a group of private, local, State, and Federal <br />interests who examined numerous projects, methods, <br />and ideas for feasibility for reducing selenium levels in <br />the Uncompahgre and Gunnison Rivers. <br />One participant in the Task Force is the NIWQP <br />because of a common interest in searching for ways to <br />reduce selenium concentrations in the Uncompahgre <br />and Gunnison Rivers. A public meeting was held by <br />the Task Force in November 1999 to obtain input from <br />the local community about what could be done to <br />reduce selenium. The Task Force and the NIWQP <br />analyzed more than 40 remediation alternatives to <br />identify feasible methods for reducing selenium in the <br />Uncompahgre and Gunnison Rivers to meet the State <br />standard of 5 gg/L. The remediation alternatives will <br />be evaluated for their effectiveness on reducing sele- <br />nium concentrations in the main-stem rivers, their cost <br />effectiveness, and their possible negative effects on the <br />local economy and lifestyle. <br />A number of remediation alternatives were <br />considered by the NIWQP prior to formation of the <br />Task Force. Some alternatives involved improving irri- <br />gation-distribution systems or improving on-farm irri- <br />gation; these are the type of projects that have been <br />used by the Salinity Control Program to reduce <br />salinity. Because the Mancos Shale has been identified <br />as the major source of selenium and salt in the lower <br />Gunnison River Basin, it was logical to assume that a <br />salinity-control type project such as canal and lateral <br />lining might provide dual benefits of reducing sele- <br />nium and salt loading. For many years, numerous <br />studies were done by government and university <br />researchers on salt-loading mechanisms and methods <br />to estimate salinity reductions attributable to canal and <br />lateral lining (for example, Duke and others, 1976; <br />Bureau of Reclamation, 1978, 1982). <br />In general, there is a correlation between sele- <br />nium load and salt load (Butler and others, 1996) in <br />the Grand and Uncompahgre Valleys; however, the <br />accuracy of estimating selenium reductions for a. canal <br />or lateral-lining project based on the salt load is not <br />known. A demonstration project to measure directly <br />how lateral lining or piping affected selenium loads <br />was proposed by the NIWQP. Such a project would <br />require a small basin in a high-selenium area, where <br />monitoring could be done rather easily, and where <br />there were a few miles of open laterals that were <br />assumed to be contributing a significant selenium load <br />(from leakage) that was measurable in that basin. Such <br />an area exists southeast of Montrose in an area drained <br />by Montrose Arroyo (fig. 1). Because there would be <br />salinity reductions from such a project, the Salinity <br />Control Program was approached along with the <br />NIWQP to provide funds for a demonstration project. <br />Amendments to the Salinity Control Act in 1995 <br />allowed the Salinity Control Program to share costs on <br />a project. Thus, with funds provided by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation (BOR) through the Salinity Control <br />Program and the NIWQP and with construction labor <br />and machinery supplied by the Uncompahgre Valley <br />Water Users Association (UVWUA), the Montrose <br />Arroyo demonstration project was initiated in 1998. <br />The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) collected sele- <br />nium and salinity data from June 1998 through <br />October 2000 to document the effects of the project. <br />The Montrose Arroyo demonstration project had <br />two objectives: <br />1. For the Salinity Control Program, to prevent an esti- <br />mated 2,300 tons per year of salt from entering <br />the Colorado River. <br />2. For the NIWQP, to demonstrate the effect of a <br />salinity-control type project, such as lateral <br />lining, on selenium loads. <br />This report describes the Montrose Arroyo <br />demonstration project and its effect on selenium and <br />salt loads in the Montrose Arroyo Basin. The report <br />also describes the monitoring plan and the method of <br />analysis used for determining the effect of the project <br />on selenium and salt loads in Montrose Arroyo. <br />INTRODUCTION