Laserfiche WebLink
would be sufficient to determine effects of the project; <br />however, placing open laterals in pipe eliminated <br />lateral waste flows that previously discharged into <br />Montrose Arroyo or tributary ditches. Lateral waste <br />flows are the excess, or unused part of the water in a <br />lateral that is not diverted to on-farm use. Often, a <br />greater quantity of flow than what is required for on- <br />farm use is diverted into a lateral to maintain sufficient <br />head and depth at all the headgates on that lateral. The <br />excess water from the lateral is usually discharged into <br />the nearest drainage ditch or natural drainage. There- <br />fore, streamflow during the irrigation season in <br />Montrose Arroyo and tributary drainage ditches is a <br />mixture of a surface-water component composed of <br />irrigation tailwater from fields and suburban areas and <br />waste flows from canals and laterals and a ground- <br />water component. Elimination of waste flows from the <br />five laterals caused lower streamflow during the irriga- <br />tion season in the arroyo and the two drainage ditches <br />(table 1). For example, at site MA2, the mean irriga- <br />tion-season streamflow decreased from 19.4 ft3/s for <br />the pre-project samples to 12.4 ft3/S for the post- <br />project samples. Because there were no waste flows <br />from the piped laterals in the post-project period, what <br />previously was wastewater from the laterals remained <br />in the AM lateral or Loutzenhizer Canal, and much of <br />that water flowed out of the basin. The lateral waste <br />flows had a selenium and salt load associated with it; <br />therefore, the question could be asked, "How much of <br />the selenium and salt reductions in Montrose Arroyo <br />were caused simply by a reduction in lateral waste <br />water?" To address that question, the irrigation-season <br />loads were separated into ground-water and surface- <br />water components. <br />The analysis of irrigation-season loads was done <br />using concentration (C) data and discharge (Q) data. <br />The method involves solving two equations: <br />Qi = QSW +Qgw (1) <br />(0)(0) = (Qsw)(Csw) + (Qgw)(Cgw) (2) <br />The i terms are the irrigation-season streamflow <br />and sample concentrations; the sw terms are the <br />surface-water component, and the gw terms are the <br />ground-water component. The Qi and Ci terms are the <br />means of the measured streamflow and sample <br />concentrations for the irrigation season at each site. <br />The mean irrigation-season selenium and salinity <br />concentrations are listed in table 1. The surface-water <br />concentrations (Csw) were estimated as the mean of <br />Table 1. Mean streamflow, selenium concentrations, and salinity concentrations for <br />irrigation-season (April through October) and nonirrigation-season (November through March) <br />samples at the five monitoring sites <br />[Pre, pre-project period; Post, post-project period; the U.S. Geological Survey site identification numbers for the <br />monitoring sites: site MA4 is 382702107493701; site D2MA is 382704107493801; site MA3 is 382711107500501; <br />site D1MA is 3 8 27 26 1 07 5 05 802; site MA2 is 382802107513301] <br />Site Streamflow Selenium Salinity <br />(fig. 2) (cubic feet per second) (micrograms per liter) (milligrams per liter) <br />Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post <br /> irrigation season <br />MA4' 0.91 1.01 18 18 2,996 3,732 <br />D2MA 2.93 1.96 32 23 1,510 1,797 <br />MA3 4.76 3.89 27 20 1,924 1,963 <br />D1MA 4.54 3.58 26 27 1,398 1,778 <br />MA2 19.4 12.4 25 27 1,277 1,703 <br /> Nonirrigation season <br />MA4 0.45 0.43 77 85 6,621 6,851 <br />D2MA .49 .24 149 89 7,107 6,702 <br />MA3 .96 .70 106 86 6,455 6,573 <br />D1MA .63 .60 65 69 4,579 4,592 <br />MA2 2.55 2.22 98 82 4,830 4,871 <br />,control site <br />6 Effects of Piping Irrigation Laterals on Selenium and Salt Loads, Montrose Arroyo Basin, Western Colorado