Laserfiche WebLink
an effective and timely means to restore wild razorback sucker populations in river reaches <br />designated within the Genetic Management Plan (Wydoski 1995) and essentially would <br />accomplish three objectives: 1) restore populations of razorback sucker to unoccupied river <br />reaches, 2) augment very small populations in occupied reaches, and 3) establish a minimum <br />viable population of at least three adult age groups (5 to 7) at the population abundance criteria <br />developed within the recovery goals for the razorback sucker (FWS 2002). <br />Summary of Razorback Sucker Experimental and Augmentation Stocking Plans <br />The RPs for the Upper Colorado River and the San Juan River basins each required that a <br />stocking plan be approved before any domestic-reared fish could be stocked into the wild. <br />Experimental stocking and augmentation plans for the razorback sucker were initially developed <br />for the Upper Colorado and Gunnison rivers in Colorado (Burdick 1992; Burdick et al. 1995) and <br />the San Juan River in New Mexico and Utah (Ryden and Pfeifer 1994). Burdick (1992) and <br />Ryden and Pfeifer (1994) addressed the essential elements for an experimental stocking program <br />to obtain fundamental information on the ecology of razorback sucker to determine the feasibility <br />and utility of augmentation or restoration stocking as a recovery tool. These were conceptual <br />plans that also discussed the rationale and justification for experimental stocking, the genetic and <br />ecological risks associated with experimental stocking, justification for selection of stocking areas, <br />and the protocol and criteria to investigate the relation between size at stocking and their <br />subsequent survival in the wild. The plans also outlined research efforts and general procedures <br />to monitor stocked fish and evaluate a stocking program. <br />Once it was demonstrated or believed that experimentally stocked fish would survive and <br />suitable habitat existed to support sub-adult and adult fish, additional plans evolved to identify the <br />number and size of fish needed to evaluate the relation between survival to size at release, and the <br />number of adult fish needed per river reach to achieve recovery. Modde et al. (1996) discussed <br />an augmentation plan for razorback sucker in the Upper Colorado River Basin coincident with <br />environmental enhancement. Individual plans were developed for the San Juan (Ryden 1997) and <br />Upper Colorado and Gunnison rivers (Burdick et al. 1995) and identified additional monitoring <br />for various sizes of stocked razorback sucker for up to 5 to 6 years. A restoration plan to <br />augment present razorback sucker populations was developed for the middle Green River in Utah <br />(Wydoski 1996). <br />The States of Colorado (Kesler 1998) and Utah (Hudson et al. 1999) later developed their <br />own individual stocking plans for each of the four mainstem endangered fishes that refined the <br />4