Laserfiche WebLink
conditions in permitting by federal agencies involved in reclaiming gravel pits. <br />Therefore, the purpose of this experiment was to evaluate two different-shaped <br />ponds, both connected to the river in the same general stream reach, by comparing <br />seasonal use by native and nonnative fish. <br />The specific objectives of this study were to: <br />1. compare seasonal fish use (species composition and relative densities) <br />of nonnative and native fishes in two ponds adjacent to each other <br />that are both connected to the river but have different water depths <br />and bottom configurations, <br />2. determine the shape of the pond that will benefit endangered and other <br />native fishes and reduce or eliminate nonnative fish that are believed <br />to adversely impact endangered fishes, and <br />3. determine if a gravel-pit pond gently graded toward the mainstem river <br />will adequately fill during spring high flows and drain during <br />recession of flows in the summer. <br />STUDY AREA <br />Gardner and Hotspot ponds are within 100 yards of each other and are in the <br />10-year floodplain of the Upper Colorado River between Palisade and Grand <br />Junction, Colorado ("15-Mile Reach"), at river mile 174.4 (Section 20, Township <br />1S Range 1E, 6th P.M.: Figure 1). The ponds can be reached by traveling to the <br />end of Mesa County Road 29-5/8 on the north side of the Colorado River. Gardner <br />Pond is the larger of the two gravel-pit ponds with a surface area of <br />approximately 7.4 acres, an average depth of about 5.5 feet, and a maximum depth <br />of 15 feet (Figure 2). The Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Division <br />of Parks and Outdoor Recreation (CDPOR), owns the land. Hotspot Pond is <br />connected to the river, privately owned, and is located immediately north of <br />Gardner Pond. It has a total surface area of 5.1 acres, an average depth of <br />about 3 feet, and is connected to the mainstem river. The Grand Junction <br />Drainage District has an easement to maintain two drainage ditches, one that runs <br />east of the site and one between the two ponds. Dominant vegetation around these <br />two ponds consists of Fremont cottonwood (Popu7us fremontii) and tamarisk. <br />The river reach adjacent to the study site is important historical habitat <br />for both the razorback sucker and Colorado squawfish. The area has been <br />identified as occupied habitat and was designated critical habitat for both <br />razorback sucker and Colorado squawfish by the FWS (effective 20 April 1994; <br />Federal Register, Vol. 59, No. 54, 21 March 1994) under authority of the <br />Endangered Species Act (FWS 1973). Various researchers (Holden and Stalnaker <br />1975: Valdez et al. 1982) documented the historic use of this area by adult <br />Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker. Osmundson and Kaeding (1989) documented <br />extensive use of the various habitat complexes in the area by adult Colorado <br />squawfish that were created following the high water years of 1983 and 1984. <br />4