Laserfiche WebLink
oxbow lakes, former side channels in broad valley fIoodplains, ponds, and wetland <br />depressions. During high flow events, some of these off-channel features were <br />temporarily connected to the river in the past. These former natural riverine <br />features could be integrated back into the historic floodplain by removing <br />portions of man-made dikes or natural obstructions (e. g., gravel/sand bars). <br />Background <br />Although gravel pits are artificial environments that are typically diked <br />and isolated from the mainstem river, they comprise a large proportion of pond <br />habitats created by gravel-pit mining in the floodplain in some river corridors <br />along the Upper Colorado River. Much of the floodplain habitat in the Upper <br />Colorado River from the Colorado-Utah state line upstream to Rifle, Colorado, on <br />the Colorado River and upstream to Austin on the Gunnison River has been modified <br />by humans either from levee construction or mining gravel. There are four areas <br />along the Upper Colorado River where gravel-mining operations have created <br />numerous pits that vary in size, depth, shape, and orientation to the mainstem <br />river: the Grand Valley between Palisade and Loma, Colorado (15- and 18-mile <br />reaches), between Rifle and Debeque, Colorado, and near Delta, Colorado, on the <br />Gunnison River. For example, Mitchell (1995) identified 243 ponds within 1 mile <br />either side of the Upper Colorado River between Palisade and Loma. He calculated <br />that these ponds totaled approximately 713 surface acres of standing water. Most <br />of these ponds were created either from gravel mining or for sewage treatment <br />plants. More importantly, these ponds are located in the former floodplain. <br />Historical aerial photos of this same area reveal very little gravel-mining <br />activity and ponds as late as 1954. In 1937 and 1954, there were no gravel pits <br />in this reach and only 'virgin' floodplain existed where the 29-5/8 Road gravel- <br />pit pond site occurs today. Even more dramatic is the approximate 15 miles of <br />man-made dikes in this 33-mile stream reach between Palisade and Loma (Irving and <br />Burdick, 1995) that effectively prevent inundation of potential off-channel <br />habitats and fish access to historic floodplain habitat. <br />During high flow events, some of these ponds have temporarily connected to <br />the river allowing access to fish. However, these ponds that do not have <br />permanent connections to the river have also trapped fish following recession of <br />high flows. Ponds that are reconnected to the river are less likely to trap <br />endangered fishes. Integrating ponds created from gravel-pit mining into the <br />historic floodplain by removing portions of dikes, resloping gravel pits toward <br />the river, and re-establishing connectivity to the river may provide off-channel <br />habitats which are beneficial for effective management of the riverine ecosystem <br />and recovery of endangered fishes. <br />Most researchers believe that connecting isolated ponds to the river can <br />be seasonally beneficial to endangered fishes. Ponds that are gently graded and <br />connected to the river should be evaluated for their use and benefit for <br />endangered fishes by providing off-channel habitats while reducing or minimizing <br />proliferation of nonnative fishes that may compete with or predate upon <br />endangered fishes. Valdez and Wick (1983) and Osmundson and Kaeding (1991) <br />hypothesized that graded gravel pits that flood during runoff and drain with <br />descending flow may benefit adult razorback sucker and Colorado squawfish by <br />providing feeding, resting, conditioning, and possibly spawning areas. Habitat <br />2