My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7747
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7747
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:11:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7747
Author
Burdick, B. D. and L. R. Kaeding.
Title
Biological Merits of Fish Passage as Part of Recovery of Colorado Squawfish in the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1990.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
expensive and their value to recovery is unknown. The recovery value of fish <br />passageways needs to be evaluated as part of planned studies. <br />When passageways may be important to recovery <br />There may be a variety of situations in which the provision of passage may <br />benefit the recovery of Colorado squawfish. An obvious one is when the existing <br />barrier prevents access of adult fish to the only suitable spawning habitat, and thus <br />spawning does not occur. This situation would be similar to that for the Pacific <br />salmons, for example, species whose populations have declined dramatically, in large <br />part because Columbia River dams prevent the adult fish from reaching headwater <br />spawning streams. If access to a limited amount of habitat occurs, spawning may <br />take place but the resulting young are too few to allow adequate recruitment to the <br />adult stock. As a result, the adult stock would be small and would be considered to <br />be "spawning habitat" limited. In addition, limitation of spawning habitat availability <br />might force genetically distinct stocks to spawn in a common habitat, thus leading to <br />interbreeding and possible loss of genetic uniqueness between stocks. <br />A second situation in which the provision of fish passage might benefit recovery is <br />when the availability of nonspawning habitat (e.g., wintering-feeding habitat) for adult <br />fish is limiting the size of the adult population. In this case, movement barriers might <br />prevent access to suitable adult habitat and the adult population could be described <br />as being "adult habitat" limited. <br />In both of these examples, the effect of the movement barrier is to further limit the <br />range of the species. The negative effect of the movement barrier on the population <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.