My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8059
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8059
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:10:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8059
Author
Burdick, B. D. and F. K. Pfeifer.
Title
Discussion Of The Merits For Fish Passage At Hartland Diversion Dam On The Gunnison River Near Delta, Colorado-Final Report.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
razorback sucker, and <br />3. Increasing the amount of available habitat that adult razorback sucker may utilize <br />for spawning and at the same time increasing the opportunity for larvae drifting <br />downstream to utilize additional flooded bottomlands. <br />Recommendation and Rationale <br />The Recovery Program should proceed with a design and engineering feasibility study for <br />a fish passageway at Hartland Diversion Darn that should include costs for constructing the fish <br />passageway. <br />Rationale: <br />1. Passage would open up an additional 15 miles of historical habitat for native and <br />endangered fish, including 7 miles of floodplain considered as a high priority <br />razorback sucker restoration area. <br />2. Passage would be concurrent with on-going reintroduction of razorback suckers <br />into the Gunnison River. (316 juvenile razorbacks were stocked in the Gunnison <br />River in autumn 1995 and more are scheduled over the next five years.) <br />3. Opportunities currently exist with the City of Delta for cost sharing because they <br />are interested in providing boat access past the structure (may change with future <br />city council members). Easier to coordinate with them from the "ground-up" <br />rather than attempting to influence or modify the design at a later date. <br />4. Opportunities exist for positive public relations and program support by working <br />cooperatively with the local community to solve their boating problem. <br />5. No reason to wait until Redlands fish ladder has been evaluated because this <br />passageway would be a completely different design. <br />6. Funding is currently available to the Program through Capital Improvement <br />dollars; no guarantee of future funding. <br />7. Passage in place to coincide with flow releases from the re-operation of Aspinall <br />pursuant to the 1997 Biological Opinion. <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.