Laserfiche WebLink
E 4 <br />0 <br />T <br />x <br />,y 3 <br />Q <br />3 <br />02 <br />Ic <br />6 <br />5 <br /> <br />BRFLOW --U SGSFLOW 1994 Water Year <br />---- --- --- --------- --- ------ <br />-------------------------I---1--------------I <br />i <br />0 <br />e <br />i5 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />T <br />x <br />.410 <br />0 <br />3 <br />_o <br />5 <br />0 <br />_ _ _ _ _ _-MI-11 <br />v w u v F M A M J J A S <br />Month <br />BRFLOW - USGSFLOW <br />I <br />?- 1995 Water Year <br />------ -----------I---- <br />r I cc <br />I i <br />c -? <br />-------------- --- -------I-? <br />rn <br />I ? <br />T <br />I <br />------------------------ <br />n_ <br />?v u % F M A M J J A S O N <br />Month <br />Figure F.1. Comparison of the mean daily streamflow of the USGS gage at <br />Whitewater minus the Redlands Canal versus the mean daily streamflow <br />of the Bureau of Reclamation (BR) gage in the 2.3-mile reach of the <br />lower Gunnison River between the Redlands Diversion Dam and the <br />confluence with the Colorado River during the study period, 1994 <br />(top) and 1995 (bottom). <br /> <br />F-1