Laserfiche WebLink
recorded, equal effort was assumed for the plunge pool and downstream reach. <br />Therefore, the number of fish captured and sighted per trip was calculated as <br />well as traditional CPUE when effort was recorded. <br />Current Sampling. Fishery data were recorded in the field on standardized <br />data forms. These data were then stored in the database management system, DBASE <br />III+, to facilitate access and analyses as well as to provide data compatible <br />with the computer system and format used by the ISMP database. Computer <br />diskettes containing the corresponding DBASE III+ files from this study are <br />available upon request through the ISMP database manager, FWS, CRFP, Grand <br />Junction, Colorado. Hydrological data generated by the HEC-2 computer program <br />that predicts various surface elevations, bed profiles, velocities, and maximum <br />water depths with corresponding streamflows are available from the BR, Western <br />Colorado Area Office, Northern Division, Grand Junction. <br />Total CPUE was used to determine relative density of fish in el ectrofi shi ng <br />collections. CPUE was calculated for each fish species and hybrid collected in <br />the plunge pool and 2.2-mile reach. Species composition and relative abundance <br />(expressed as a percent) were used to describe the fish community in the plunge <br />pool and 2.2-mile reach. Total CPUE was plotted against flow for dates sampled <br />in 1994 and 1995 for four native fishes and three nonnative fishes collected in <br />the plunge pool and 2.2-mile reach. The four native species included bluehead <br />sucker, flannelmouth sucker, roundtail chub, and Colorado squawfish; the three <br />nonnative fishes included common carp, white sucker, and channel catfish. CPUE <br />was regressed against flow for sub-adult and adult Colorado squawfish collected <br />between 1987-1988 and 1991-1995. A combined total CPUE was also determined for <br />the four native fishes and for the three nonnative fishes. This combined total <br />CPUE for native and nonnative fishes was regressed against flow for dates sampled <br />in the plunge pool and 2.2-mile reach. <br />Discharge <br />Streamflow records for the Gunnison River were obtained from the USGS <br />stream gaging station at Whitewater, Colorado (No. 9152500). Data for flows <br />diverted by the Redlands Canal were obtained from the State of Colorado, Division <br />of Water Resources (CDWR). In this report, two different methods were used to <br />determine the flow in the 2.3-mile reach. The first method subtracted the <br />Redlands Canal flow from the streamflow at the USGS gage at Whitewater. Where <br />water records were not available for the canal, 750 cfs was used. A streamflow <br />gage installed by BR in March 1994 at RM 2.6 (CDWR No. GUNREDBCO) provided a <br />direct means of determining streamflows in the reach. Mean-daily streamflow was <br />obtained for the dates when water depth-transect data were recorded and for dates <br />when fish were sampled. Monthly flow exceedence was determined from mean daily <br />flows for the post-Aspinall water development period, 1967-1994. The mean daily <br />flow was the mean of 24 hourly discharge values. <br />Approach For Recommending Minimum Streamflow <br />Minimum flow recommended in this study is defined as one providing passage <br />for sub-adult and adult Colorado squawfish in the 2.3-mile reach. Determination <br />10