My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7848
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7848
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:10:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7848
Author
Burdick, B. D.
Title
Minimum Flow Recommendation For Passage Of Colorado Squawfish And Razorback Sucker In The 2.3-Mile Reach Of The Lower Gunnison River
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Redlands Diversion Dam To The Colorado River Confluence.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
to fish, while maximizing el ectrof i shi ng effectiveness. Motorized el ectrof i shi ng <br />jon boats facilitated maneuvering around the plunge pool, into eddy habitats, <br />fast velocities of shorelines, and traveling upstream to sample fish. <br />Because the study area was only 2.3 miles long, the entire reach was <br />sampled during each trip. Information was collected and recorded separately for <br />the 0.1-mile plunge pool and the downstream 2.2-mile reach. The plunge pool was <br />defined as the riverine area immediately downstream of the Redlands Diversion Dam <br />and extended downstream for 0.1 mile. In the 2.2-mile reach, the electrofishing <br />boat was maneuvered downstream slowly in an "S"-shaped manner from one shoreline <br />to the other to sample mid-channel habitats. The numbers of fish by species and <br />age category (young-of-the-year [YOY], sub-adult [JUV], or adult [ADU]) were <br />recorded on field data sheets at the end of each sample effort. Age - class <br />groupings established in 1979-1981 by the Colorado River Fishery Project (CRFP; <br />Miller et al. 1982; Appendix B; Table B.1.) were used. Effort was recorded in <br />seconds which was later converted to hours electrofished. All fish collections <br />were accompanied with detailed information regarding location, date, time of day, <br />habitat type, conductivity, water temperature, and voltage and amperage output <br />of electrofishing equipment. All Colorado squawfish and northern pike that were <br />collected were initially checked for a PIT tag, weighed (g), and measured (total <br />length [TL]). Colorado squawfish and northern pike that had not been previously <br />captured were PIT tagged. All Colorado squawfish were scanned for a coded-nose- <br />wire tag (Northwest Marine Technology) to determine if they were hatchery- <br />produced fish previously stocked in the river. Other native and nonnative fishes <br />collected during this study were not weighed or measured because length and <br />weight data had been recorded for a large number of native and nonnative fishes <br />captured in this reach during 1992 and 1993 (Burdick 1995). All fish were <br />released alive. Data sheets were completed and the elapsed-time clock on the <br />VVP-15 was reset after each sample effort. <br />Hydrological <br />BR Transects <br />Twenty-seven cross sections were surveyed in April 1993 by BR personnel <br />from the Redlands Diversion Dam to the confluence with the Colorado River to <br />describe the geometry and flow characteristics of the river in the 2.3-mile <br />reach. These 27 transects which provided maximum coverage of the reach were <br />integrated into this study. For each of the 27 transects, the mean and maximum <br />water depth and the number of water depths that exceeded 1 foot and 2 feet <br />between 100 and 600 cfs were computed from the HEC-2 (Hydrologic Engineering <br />Center) output. Eleven of the 27 transects that were believed to provide habitat <br />or might have critically shallow water depths during low-flow periods were <br />graphed and further analyzed. <br />A backwater profile was developed using the HEC-2 water surface profile <br />program developed by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. This program calculates <br />water surface profiles for steady, gradually varied flow in natural or human-made <br />channels with irregularly shaped cross sections. In essence, the program <br />predicts velocity and maximum depths with various corresponding flows. Staff <br />gages were placed at three different locations in the reach (at RM's 2.7, 1.4, <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.