Laserfiche WebLink
CRITICALLY LOW WATER DEPTHS OCCURRED AT THREE LOCATIONS IN THE <br />2.3 -MILE REACH DURING LOW FLOWS IN 1994 <br />Transects 9, 19, and 20 (river miles 2.7 and 1.4, respectively), had <br />empirical maximum water depths of 0.8, 1.1, and 1 feet, respectively, at flows <br />ranging from 245-276 cfs during late-July and early August 1994. Predicted <br />maximum water depths were 1.1 feet at transects 9 and 19 at 300 cfs. Although <br />there were two thalwegs across transect 9, only 7% of the channel width exceeded <br />1 foot at 300 cfs. A maximum water depth of 1 foot was exceeded at only one <br />location at transect 9 at 300 and 400 cfs. A water depth of at least 1 foot <br />would be maintained across 10% of the channel width at 500 cfs. A flow of 850 <br />cfs was estimated to maintain a mean water depth of 1 foot through the.entire <br />transect. <br />At transect 19, the predicted mean and maximum water depth was 0.7 and 1 <br />foot, respectively, at 300 cfs; only 5% (one predicted observation) of the <br />channel width exceeded 1 foot. Seventy percent of the channel width had a mean <br />water depth of 1 foot at 600 cfs. A flow of 1,400 cfs would be required to <br />maintain a mean water depth of 2 feet. At transect 20, the empirical measured <br />mean water depth was 0.6 at 266 cfs; none of the water depths exceeded 1 foot at <br />266 cfs. <br />CATCH RATE VERSUS FLOW WAS NOT PRACTICAL FOR IDENTIFYING MINIMUM FLOWS <br />A minimum "threshold flow" for fish passage could not be determined using <br />catch rate and flows because a strong positive relationship between the two <br />variables did not exist. Although flows were known on capture dates, this method <br />did not provide the resolution to identify the flow endangered and native fishes <br />might leave the reach and move downstream where more suitable habitat conditions <br />existed. Instead, the relationships were a reflection of catch efficiency: <br />higher catch rates occurred during low flows because fish were more vulnerable <br />and easier to capture than during high flows. <br />A 300 CFS INSTANTANEOUS FLOW IS RECOMMENDED FOR THE <br />2.3-MILE REACH OF THE LOWER GUNNISON RIVER <br />Predicted and empirical water depths were used to recommend a 300 cfs <br />minimum flow to provide passage in the 2.3-mile reach of the Lower Gunnison River <br />using water releases from upstream Federal Reservoirs. A 300 cfs flow will