Laserfiche WebLink
I. Stocked fish may disperse initially in search of adequate food resources <br />and suitable habitat. Generally, stocked Colorado River fishes have <br />moved downstream. When they reach sexual maturity, they may move long <br />distances seeking olfactory cues to spawning sites. Therefore, the <br />greatest risk would be for the fish to migrate into the Green River sub- <br />basin via its confluence with the Colorado River where they could spawn <br />with the middle Green River stock and modify the genetic integrity of <br />that population. However, genetic studies have shown that Colorado <br />River razorbacks are essentially a subset of the Green River population <br />and the very limited gene exchange that might occur should have no <br />negative effect on that population. <br />2. Although it has been documented that razorback sucker have fidelity to <br />certain spawning sites, it is unknown whether the fish was imprinted to <br />the site as an egg or larvae, or if it is a learned behavior. If <br />imprinting to a natal spawning site occurs, it is possible that the <br />stocked razorbacks may not be able to find a suitable spawning site as <br />adults. However, it is likely that even though the stocked fish are not <br />imprinted to a specific spawning site, they will be attracted to sites <br />with certain physical characteristics or odors from other razorbacks <br />when the desire to spawn occurs. <br />Some fish used in future stockings may be imprinted to artificial <br />chemicals (morpholine and phenthyl alcohol) if ongoing chemoreception <br />studies proceed as planned. The proposed studies include field <br />evaluations using razorback suckers stocked into the Gunnison River - <br />morpholine will be added to the Gunnison River and phenthyl alcohol <br />(PEA) to the Uncompahgre River when the fish reach a mature size to <br />determine if imprinting does occur. If imprinting is shown to be an <br />important factor in successful reproduction, it will become a component <br />of future propagation efforts. <br />i <br />D. Methods and Approach for Field Study <br />1. Time Frame <br />This stocking plan addresses propagation activities for razorback sucker <br />for a five-year period from FY 1996 through FY 2000. The stocking plan <br />will be evaluated and updated at that time. An initial stocking, based <br />on the protocol presented here, has already occurred. Three hundred <br />sixteen PIT-tagged razorback suckers from five family lots were stocked <br />into the Gunnison River in early October. Monitoring for these fish is <br />ongoing. <br />2. Assumptions used to develop the stocking plan <br />a. Razorback sucker that are a minimum of 4-inches should be able to <br />escape most predation by nonnative fishes and are large enough to <br />feed on organisms larger than zooplankton that would decrease the <br />potential for competition with nonnative fishes.. Four inches is also <br />the smallest fish that can be safely PIT tagged. <br />5