My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8232
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8232
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:09:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8232
Author
Burdick, B. D.
Title
Evaluation of Fish Passage at the Grand Valley Irrigation Company Diversion Dam on the Colorado River Near Palisade, Colorado.
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
CAP-17,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
dam or simply passed over the diversion structure when it was inundated during <br />spring runoff. Eight of the ten fish captured upstream of the diversion dam had <br />been initially captured and PIT tagged downstream of the diversion dam either <br />sometime prior to- or during the 1998 runoff. Five of these eight fish were last <br />captured downstream of the diversion dam in 1998 between 23 April and 11 June, <br />one was captured in June 1997, one in April 1993, and one in June 1991. <br />This is not the first time that Colorado pikeminnow have been reported <br />upstream of the GVIC Diversion Dam. The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />(Osmundson and Kaeding 1989) documented a radio-tagged adult Colorado pikeminnow <br />moving upstream to the GVIC Diversion Dam in mid-July 1986. The fish eventually <br />passed the structure and moved upstream to the base of the Price-Stubb Dam. This <br />fish either moved upstream over the GVIC Diversion or could have passed around <br />the diversion dam via the Orchard Mesa Irrigation Diversion (OMID) bypass canal. <br />Flows at this time were approximately between 5,700 and 7,600 cfs over the GVIC <br />Diversion Dam, therefore it is suspected this fish may have passed around the <br />structure via the bypass canal. This fish remained until late-September when it <br />returned downstream and passed either over or around the diversion dam (via the <br />OMID bypass canal or through the GVIC flood gates). The same fish returned to <br />the base of the GVIC Diversion Dam in late-July 1987 and progressed upstream to <br />the base of Price-Stubb Dam. It remained there until mid-September 1987, when <br />it again made its way downstream, passing the GVIC Diversion. <br />Valdez et al. (1982) sampled the Upper Colorado River between Palisade and <br />Debeque, Colorado (RM 210), between 1979-1981. Most of their sampling occurred <br />upstream of the Government Highline Diversion Dam but they did sample the river <br />reach between Government Highline and Price-Stubb Diversion dams once each during <br />July 1979 and April 1980. They reported collecting six native and four nonnative <br />fish species with electrofishing, fyke nets, gill nets, and seines. Valdez <br />(1984) sampled the Upper Colorado River between Government Highline Diversion and <br />the Price-Stubb dams with electrofishing, seines, dip nets, and drift nets <br />between April and September 1984. During this same period, he sampled the Upper <br />Colorado River between the Price-Stubb and GVIC Diversion dams, but only <br />sparingly with seines. Valdez did not collect any Colorado pikeminnow during any <br />of these investigations. Kidd (1982) caught sub-adult Colorado pikeminnow <br />(number unknown) in a backwater immediately downstream of the GVIC Diversion Dam <br />in the spring and early-summer of 1980. According to Kidd (personal <br />communication), this backwater is synonymous with the location of the present <br />series of pools and riffles that were constructed for fish passage i n 1998 at the <br />GVIC Diversion Dam. <br />Telemetry <br />Two adult Colorado pikeminnow were implanted with LOTEK~ transmitters in <br />mid-April, one approximately 2 miles downstream of the diversion dam and the <br />other approximately 4 miles downstream. However, neither these two or any other <br />pikeminnow that had active LOTEK" transmitters associated with other ongoing <br />studies were detected moving through or downstream of the GVIC Diversion Dam by <br />the automated LOTEK~ data-logging station that had been deployed at the diversion <br />dam in early-April. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.