My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9432 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9432 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:09:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9432
Author
Modde, T. and M. Fuller.
Title
Feasibility of Channel Catfish Reduction in the Lower Yampa River.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Vernal.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
because of diversion dams constructed during the first part of the 20th century. <br />These low-head diversion dams have altered Colorado pi keminnow movement patterns, <br />disrupted reproductive behavior, and reduced the number of available spawning <br />sites. <br />An ancillary part of the passageway evaluation was to follow the movements <br />of radio-tagged fish during the spawning period in hopes that they might help <br />identify spawning locations in the Upper Colorado River upstream of Westwater <br />Canyon. During July of 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999, the presumed spawning period, <br />the movements of radio-tagged pikeminnow revealed that they mostly remained <br />scattered and separated, or in pairs, similar to that noted by McAda and Kaeding <br />(1991). During July 1997 and 1998, however, one radio-tagged pikeminnow (Code <br />126) was located in the "vicinity" (1-mile downstream) from an aggregation of <br />non- radio- tagged pikeminnow (RM 168.8) in the 18-mile reach of the Upper Colorado <br />River (see Appendix; Table K.9. for an explanation of the numbers of pikeminnow <br />captured in 1994, 1998, and 1999). While the opportunity existed for this fish <br />to congregate with other non-radio-tagged fish believed to be spawning, ground <br />tracking never detected them in close, spatial proximity with each other. No <br />radio-tagged fish were found near this site during 1999. Tracking protocol <br />employed during this evaluation may have limited our ability to locate <br />radiotagged pikeminnow with other congregating pikeminnow during this period. <br />Only about 10-15 minutes were spent with each individual radio-tagged fish once <br />they were contacted on any given search date. <br />Summary <br />Although 43 Colorado pikeminnow ascended the fish passageway during the <br />this study, none of the 29 Colorado pikeminnow implanted with radio transmitters <br />in 1996, 1997, or 1998 ascended the passageway at Redlands. Four pikeminnow that <br />ascended the fishway in 1999, were radiotagged, and subsequently moved downstream <br />over the Redlands Diversion Dam did not reascend the fishway. <br />Radiotelemetry provided data on, 1) the fate of some of the pikeminnow <br />released upstream of the diversion dam, 2) the duration that they spent upstream <br />of the diversion dam, 3) documented when they passed over the dam, and 4) <br />monitored subsequent movements presumed to be related to spawning. A similar <br />movement pattern was observed following spawning in 1996, 1997, and 1998: nine <br />radio-tagged pikeminnow returned to the Lower Gunnison River from the Colorado <br />River during this time. Three returned in 1996, four in 1997, and two in 1998. <br />The time that they remained in the Lower Gunnison River ranged from late-July to <br />mid-September. Six of these fish were detected in the Redlands Dam plunge pool <br />and three fish remained scattered throughout the remaining 2.2-mile reach during <br />45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.