Laserfiche WebLink
Osmundson, unpublished data). During this same period, the whole river <br />population increased from.465 to 664 (43%). One reason for this increase in <br />population could be that a strong year-class of pikeminnow was produced in the <br />early 1990's. There are other possible reasons for this increase, but they are <br />also only speculative. If food sources and supply were inadequate in the lower <br />reach, and the number of sub-adult and adult pikeminnow had exceeded the carrying <br />capacity for the reach during this period, then a greater number of sub-adult <br />pikeminnow may have moved upstream to the upper reach during the mid-1990's in <br />search of new food sources. Or, possibly an innate physiological mechanism <br />compelled sub-adult pikeminnow to disperse upstream (e. g., seek new home range). <br />If this is so, this may explain why pikeminnow river net catch rate in the upper <br />reach peaked in 1998 and why the numbers of pikeminnow that used the Redlands <br />passageway were also the highest in both 1997 and 1998. If this is true, <br />conversely one might suspect that the number of pi kemi nnow that moved through the <br />passageway during 1997 and 1998 was aberrantly high compared to the number of <br />pikeminnow that passed through during 1999 and 2000. <br />Fallback <br />Some of the native fish that had passed through the passageway fell back <br />over the Redlands Dam following their release upstream of the dam. Evidence for <br />this was provided by marking three of the non-endangered native species <br />(flannelmouth sucker, bluehead sucker, and roundtail chub) and nonnative fishes <br />that were captured in the fish trap in 1996. Marked native and nonnative fish <br />that had reascended the passageway and were later recaptured in the fish trap <br />provided data on numbers of fish that did fall back over the dam and that fish <br />could survive such an event. Colorado pikeminnow captured in the fish trap that <br />were either PIT- or radio-tagged and subsequently recaptured either in the fish <br />trap or in reaches of the Lower Gunnison and Upper Colorado rivers downstream of <br />the diversion dam provided additional evidence that fish had successfully <br />negotiated the fall over the diversion dam. <br />In 1996, 7,187 flannelmouth sucker, bluehead sucker, and roundtail chub <br />found in the fish trap were marked. Of these, 143 (2.0%) reascended the <br />passageway and were recaptured in the fish trap. Of 370 nonnative fishes marked, <br />34 (9.2X) reascended the passageway and were again found in the fish trap. <br />Nonnative fish recaptured included white sucker (31), green sunfish (2), and carp <br />(1). Of 100 hybrid suckers marked, 5 (5%) were recaptured in the fish trap. <br />As described earlier, seven different PIT-tagged Colorado pikeminnow <br />reascended the passageway and were recaptured in the fish trap. Six other <br />pikeminnow that ascended the fish passageway and were released immediately <br />35