My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9432 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9432 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:09:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9432
Author
Modde, T. and M. Fuller.
Title
Feasibility of Channel Catfish Reduction in the Lower Yampa River.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Vernal.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The high- and low-use periods were determined examining the total catches <br />of these three native fishes from Table 2. High-use periods coincided mostly <br />from 1 April to 2 July. However, in 1997 the period extended to 31 July; in <br />2000, this period ended in late-May. Low-use periods were mostly from 31 July <br />to mid- to late-October. The dates and number of days within the high- and low- <br />use periods varied among years. The ratio was lowest in 1996 (2.51). However, <br />only 38 days between 24 June and 31 July were used for the high-use period <br />because the passageway did not become operational until 24 June. Therefore, <br />because 1996 was an abbreviated season, it is probably not a good year for <br />comparison. The ratio steadily increased to 3.59 in 1997, 4.45 in 1998, 5.69 in <br />1999, and 7.31 in 2000. In 1999, the second highest ratio was experienced, <br />indicating that fewer native fish were captured between 31 July and 9 October, <br />the period when discharges in the Gunnison River were unseasonably higher than <br />the other four years when the passageway was operated. However, in 2000, the <br />total volume and mean daily discharge were 48% lower than 1999, the year the <br />ratio was the highest of all five years (7.31; Appendix; Table I.1.). <br />This method provides a very cursory examination and its major drawback is <br />that it does not examine catch directly as a function of discharge, (i. e., it <br />does not utilize mean daily, weekly, or biweekly discharges to determine if there <br />is a relationship between concomitant daily, weekly, or biweekly catches of the <br />three native fishes used). Also, the difference and variability in the dates of <br />high- and low-use periods, the unequal number of days used among years to <br />calculate a ratio, and only 1-year (1999) where unseasonably high post-runoff <br />flows were experienced make it difficult to determine if this method is useful <br />in ascertaining if these unseasonably high flows negatively impacted native fish <br />migration through the passageway. <br />Fish-Use vs. Base-Flow Periods. The total aggregate number of flannelmouth <br />sucker, bluehead sucker, and roundtail chub and the number of Colorado pi keminnow <br />collected in the Redlands passageway fish trap between 31 July and 9 October were <br />plotted against flow volume for the same period for each of the five years. No <br />relationship was apparent between various Gunnison River flow volumes (low vs. <br />moderate vs. high) during this period and the number of these fishes (r=0.0158 <br />for flannelmouth sucker, bluehead sucker, and roundtail chub; r=0.00953 for <br />Colorado pikeminnow) collected in the fish trap (Figure 8). Further analyses <br />were conducted between the total daily aggregate number of these same three non- <br />listed, native species and the mean daily discharge for the range of flows <br />available during 31 July to 9 October for each of the five years. Correlation <br />coefficients for each of the five years were similar: 1996 (r=-0.17; low-water <br />period); 1997 (r=-0.26; moderate-water period); 1998 (r=-0.29; low-water period); <br />1999 (r=-0.22; high-water period); 2000 (r=-0.34: low-water period; Appendix; <br />Figure I.1.). There was no clear relationship when the total aggregate number <br />31
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.