Laserfiche WebLink
Colorado pikeminnow collected in the fish trap were weighed (g), measured <br />(TL-mm), and checked for a PIT tag. If they had not been previously marked, they <br />were PIT-tagged. All Colorado pikeminnow that were collected in the fish trap, <br />including the four Colorado pikeminnow that were implanted with radiotags in <br />1999, were released immediately upstream of the diversion dam. In 1996, all non- <br />endangered native fish collected in fish trap between 24 June and 6 September <br />were marked (left pelvic fin-clip) and released upstream of the dam to determine <br />dispersement and distribution following release. Dispersement and distribution <br />of marked fish that moved upstream from the dam were determined by systematically <br />electrofishing with two boats downstream from Hartland Diversion to Redlands <br />Diversion Dam in late-September 1996. Recaptures of marked fish in the fish trap <br />indicated that they had fallen back over the dam and reascended the passageway. <br />In addition to collecting fish data from the fish trap, crews were <br />responsible for removing riverborne sediment from the fish trap that usually <br />built up during runoff, and routine (daily) cleaning of surface and submerged <br />trash, debris, and algae from the trash grates and bar screens in the forebay of <br />the passageway, and aluminum conduit screens in the fish trap. The amount of <br />algae, debris, trash, and sediment that accumulated daily at this site was <br />seasonally variable, depending upon flow magnitude and water volume during the <br />water year. FWS crews were also responsible for opening and winterizing the fish <br />passageway. <br />Radiotelemetry <br />The spatial and temporal movements of radio-tagged sub-adult and adult <br />Colorado pikeminnow were monitored by tracking fish from boats and from fixed, <br />semi-permanent, land-based tracking stations. Radiotelemetry provided data on <br />the movement and fate of sub-adult and adult Colorado pikeminnow in the immediate <br />vicinity of the Redlands passageway, in river reaches up- and downstream of the <br />passageway in the Gunnison River, and reaches of the Colorado River up- and <br />downstream of the confluence with the Gunnison River. <br />This was the first passageway constructed specifically to pass Colorado <br />pikeminnow and razorback sucker. Telemetry was used because it was uncertain <br />whether Colorado pikeminnow or razorback sucker would use the passageway. If <br />Colorado pikeminnow or razorback sucker were collected in the forebay fish trap, <br />this would obviously indicate that they had negotiated the passageway. However, <br />if fish were not found in the fish trap, there were several possible <br />explanations: <br />1. The fish could not reach the passageway because downstream flows in <br />13