My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9432 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9432 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:09:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9432
Author
Modde, T. and M. Fuller.
Title
Feasibility of Channel Catfish Reduction in the Lower Yampa River.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Vernal.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
passageway and have moved up and entered the fish trap, they must be handled and <br />processed by researchers. Presently, a series of vertically positioned 2.1-cm <br />diameter aluminum conduits (0.9-cm spacing) comprise a baffle at the uppermost <br />end of the fish trap which prevents larger fish from continuing further upstream. <br />Larger fish upstream of the dam are prevented from moving downstream through the <br />fish passageway by a series of four, vertically- stacked trash grates (1.9-cm <br />spacing) and by a concrete bulkhead. Smaller bodied-fish (less than 100 mm total <br />length [TL]) are able to freely pass through the 0.9-cm spaces between the <br />conduits and trash grates and therefore can move uninhibited both up- and <br />downstream through the passageway. These smaller fish included native speckled <br />dace, and nonnative cyprinids, (fathead minnow, sand shiner, and red shiner), and <br />other juvenile native (bluehead, flannelmouth, and roundtail chub) and nonnative <br />fish (carp, green sunfish, white sucker, etc.) of the larger-sized forms. <br />The passageway could be converted to a "run-of-the-river" passageway, if <br />desired. This would require removing the aluminum baffle at the head end of the <br />fish trap and the stop-log panel located in a slot of the concrete head wall <br />immediately upstream of this baffle. Additionally, some of the vertical bars of <br />all the vertically-stacked trash grates that are upstream of the slide gate would <br />have to be removed to increase spacing for larger fish to pass through. <br />Alternatively, these trash grates could be removed altogether. The slide gate <br />would remain open (1-m wide) and along with the opening created by removal of the <br />stop log panel (0.5-m wide) adjacent to the slide gate would allow fish to pass <br />freely upstream. The new 0.5-m wide opening created by removing the stop log <br />panel would function similar to the orifices in the downstream aluminum baffles. <br />One of the major features of the fish passageway is the fish trapping <br />facility located at the upper end or forebay. Here, fish are dip-netted by hand <br />and placed in a 2.7-m wide by 2.7-m long collapsible net. An electrical, 2-ton <br />crane-hoist facilitates lifting the fish and net from the fish trap. Fish are <br />then dumped onto a sorting table where they are sorted, examined, counted by <br />species, and placed in one of two concrete holding tanks. An electric <br />submersible sump pump provides water to the holding tanks. Native fish and <br />salmonids exit one of the holding tanks through a 0.3-m underground PVC pipe and <br />enter the river approximately 30 m upstream of the dam; nonnative fish are <br />removed. <br />Studies of the Gunnison River <br />Several interdisciplinary studies conducted over the past decade as part <br />of the Aspinall Unit investigations have addressed the hydrology and <br />geomorphol ogy of the Col orado and Gunni son ri vers as wel 1 as the 1 i fe hi story and <br />9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.