My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9432 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9432 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:09:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9432
Author
Modde, T. and M. Fuller.
Title
Feasibility of Channel Catfish Reduction in the Lower Yampa River.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Vernal.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ground tracking never detected them in close, spatial proximity with each other. <br />Consequently, during this evaluation, movement data from radio-tagged pikeminnow <br />during spawning did not lead researchers associated with other ongoing station <br />Recovery Implementation Program studies to delineate aggregations of pikeminnow <br />or identify new and verify former spawning areas either in the Gunnison or <br />Colorado rivers. <br />No documentable evidence was obtained from this evaluation to conclude that <br />stocked juvenile, sub-adult, or adult razorback sucker used the fish passage at <br />Redlands. Certainly, more time will be required to determine if razorback sucker <br />become established in local rivers and meaningful conclusions can be made as to <br />the usefulness and role fish passage will provide for recovery of this species. <br />Several different movement chronologies can be described for Colorado <br />pikeminnow using and occupying the Gunnison River. First, prior to the fish <br />passageway being constructed, some fish captured downstream from Redlands <br />Diversion Dam that were radiotagged and translocated upstream of the Redlands <br />Diversion Dam returned downstream over this dam and survived, whereas others <br />remained upstream of the dam for over 7 years. Second, fish captured upstream <br />of the diversion dam that were determined to be residents of the Gunnison River <br />were recaptured 6 to 7 years later very near the location of their original <br />capture. These included both fish that had been radiotagged and those that had <br />not. Following construction of the passageway at Redlands, other movement <br />chronologies were documented. First, some non-radiotagged fish that had moved <br />through the passageway remained upstream following release; others moved <br />downstream over the dam. Second, some fish that moved through the passageway and <br />were released upstream of the diversion dam, subsequently moved downstream over <br />the diversion dam and reascended the same passageway. <br />Construction of the passageway at Redlands Dam has reconnected a small <br />remnant population of Colorado pikeminnow in the Gunnison River to that in the <br />Colorado River. The passageway has provided a means by which both listed and <br />non-listed, native fish populations downstream of the diversion dam can <br />interchange with the existing native fish populations upstream of this structure. <br />Also, Colorado pikeminnow now can re-colonize and re-populate stream reaches <br />upstream of the dam in the Gunnison River, demonstrating that these populations <br />in the Colorado and Gunnison rivers are no longer physically isolated. <br />Recommendations are to annually, 1) operate the passageway for 5-1/2 months <br />from 1 April through 15 September, 2) monitor fish use of the Redlands passageway <br />by sorting and enumerating all fish collected in the fish trap, and 3) continue <br />selective passage, that is, remove all nonnative fishes. Also, 4) investigate <br />the extent that sub-adult and adult Colorado pikeminnow use the tailrace between <br />the Redlands Power Plant and Colorado River, especially the period that coincides <br />with pikeminnow use of the Redlands fishway. Finally, 5) no modifications are <br />recommended to the existing within-passageway features or to the overall <br />mechanical operation of the Redlands passageway. <br />xv
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.