Laserfiche WebLink
were contacted over 400 days. One fish (.150 Mhz) was never contacted following <br />release. Only nine radio contacts were made with three different fish during <br />1995. <br />Following release, fish either remained at the stocking site or dispersed <br />downstream. Throughout the study, fish collectively moved a total of 481.5 river <br />miles, most of which was predominantly downstream (385.6 miles; Figure 2). The <br />mean maximum displacement for the 20 fish was four times greater downstream than <br />upstream (19.3 versus 4.8 miles: Figure 3). Eight fish exhibited both up- and <br />downstream movement sometime during the contact period: only three fish (.010, <br />.050, and .241 Mhz) exhibited greater upstream than downstream movement. Eleven <br />fish exhibited only downstream movement. Of particular interest was the movement <br />of one razorback sucker (.260 Mhz). This fish was released at RM 211.1 and <br />passed over the Government Hi ghline Diversion and Price Stubb dams, and the Grand <br />Valley Irrigation Diversion. It was contacted on 24 and 27 June 1994 in "Hotspot <br />Pond" at RM 174. It was last contacted downstream at RM 170.6 8 August 1994. <br />Although two other fish (.300 and .620 Mhz) also passed over these three dams, <br />it is uncertain whether they were alive at the time. Radiotag .300 Mhz was later <br />recovered at RM 162.3, 9 August 1994 and the disposition of radiotag .620 Mhz is <br />unknown since its last contact 15 June 1994 at RM 168.3. Fish .050 Mhz exhibited <br />the greatest upstream movement. This fish moved 36.4 miles upstream and the last <br />contact was 11.2 miles upstream from where it was stocked. <br />Fish .010, .050, and .241 Mhz were the only three fish that were determined <br />to be alive at last contact. These three fish had all moved upstream from their <br />former radio contact locations. Radio contact had been lost with these three <br />fish for several weeks during runoff in 1995. These fish may have migrated to <br />reaches upstream in the Upper Colorado River that were not searched during this <br />time and returned downstream later following runoff, or, their radio signal was <br />not detected by radio tracking crews duriro runoff. The movements of these three <br />fish were unlike the 17 other stocked razo-back sucker. All three of these fish <br />initially moved downstream, eventually returned to their release sites, and then <br />moved upstream from their release sites. <br />At the termination of the study, 3 fish were confirmed alive, 10 were <br />missing, 2 were confirmed dead, and 5 were presumed dead. Four radiotags were <br />recovered, the first on 12 May, the last on 25 August 1994. Mortality in 1994 <br />did not appear to be immediate but delayed following stocking. The low number <br />of radio contacts in 1995 suggests either radiotag failure or missing fish had <br />moved outside the tracking search routes. In any event, post-stocking survival <br />was low. Confirmed mortality was 10%. Actual mortality was likely as high as <br />85% if missing and presumed dead fish were included. <br />Gunnison River <br />A total of 195 individual radio contacts was made periodically with 23 of <br />the 25 fish released. Between 12 April 1994 and 1 November 1995, radio contact <br />was made with fish on 47 different days. Radio contact ranged from 29 to 532 <br />days (Table 2). Eleven fish were contacted between 113 and 146 days; only one <br />fish was contacted over 150 days (.683 Mhz). Two fish (.112 and .320 Mhz) were <br />never contacted following release. Of the thirteen radio contacts during 1995, <br />8