Laserfiche WebLink
1. determine movement, distribution, and dispersal patterns of razorback <br />sucker released in the river, <br />2. determine survival and habitat use following stocking, <br />3. determine movement of radio-tagged fish prior to- and during the <br />spawning period to evaluate potential spawning and to identify <br />potential spawning areas, <br />4. determine the usefulness of pond-reared fish for augmenting or <br />restoring wild populations, <br />5. determine the utility of using a very small number of fish to <br />experimentally evaluate restoration or augmentation potential, and <br />6. provide recommendations for the number and size for stocking razorback <br />sucker to augment or restore razorback sucker populations. <br />STUDY AREA <br />The study area was the Upper Colorado River from Rifle, Colorado, <br />downstream to Westwater Wash (river mile [RM] 241.0-125.0) and the Gunnison River <br />from Hartland Dam near Delta, Colorado, to the confluence with the Colorado River <br />(RM 60.0-0.7). Both stream reaches are within critical habitat for razorback <br />sucker. <br />METHODS <br />Adult razorback sucker' were captured from Etter Pond with trammel nets in <br />early-April 1994. Adult razorback sucker were surgically implanted with 4.5-year <br />radio transmitters. Advanced Telemetry Systems (ATS°) radio transmitters were <br />equipped with an internal loop antennae, powered by a lithium battery, emitted <br />a unique signal in the 40 Mhz frequency band, and weighed 27 g. The transmitter <br />had a microprocessor chip to emit a signal for 12 h and be "asleep" or off for <br />12 h. This increased tag life expectancy to 4.5 years. Transmitter weight was <br />no more than 2.8% of fish body weight. Following capture, all fish were held in <br />a holding tank with 0.5% salt (by weight) solution. Fish were then anesthetized <br />with MS-222, weighed (g), measured (total length [TL], mm), muscle-plugged for <br />genetic analyses, and PIT-tagged. Implanted fish were injected with an <br />antibiotic, Gentocin (0.5 ml/2 k body weight). Surgical procedures for <br />implanting the radio transmitters followed that of Hart and Summerfelt (1975) and <br />Tyus (1984). Following surgery, fish were held in a holding pen in Etter Pond <br />for 24 h to recover. Fish were transported in a 225-gallon tank with 0.5% salt <br />by vehicle to the stocking sites. Fish were stocked immediately into the river. <br />One razorback sucker was implanted with a non-functional radiotag and held <br />in a pond at Horsethief State Wildlife Area (SWA) for observation. In March <br />1 Geneticists determined that razorback sucker from Etter Pond were 'pure' razorback sucker. <br />3