My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9482
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9482
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:09:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9482
Author
Burdick.
Title
Minimum Flow Recommendation for Passage of Colorado Squawfish and Razorback Sucker in the Lower Gunnison River
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Redlands Diversion Dam to the Colorado River Confluence
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
03/13/98 15:08 0 303 245 8933 FISH It WILDLIFE 444 R 0 4 Denver IM007/011 <br />during winter. Water temperatures have been reduced from historic temperatures <br />by a maximum of about 1.8°C in occupied habitat (McAda and Kaeding 1991). Tnese <br />modifications are typical of the ecological changes in a river after the <br />construction of a large dam (Vanicek et al. 1970). <br />Large dams and diversion structures can also be effective instreas barriers <br />that fragment stream reaches which can reduce the range of these native species <br />by precluding both young and adult fish from returning upstream after they have <br />migrated downstream. This affects species that migrate long distances to fulfill <br />life history requirements, especially the potamodromous Colorado squawfish (Tyus <br />1984; Tyus 1990). Instream barriers that divert water from main channel rivers <br />for irrigation and power generation have also served to reduce the range of these <br />species by rendering downstream reaches uninhabitable during low-flow perioas. <br />In upper basin rivers, this situation usually occurs downstream of diversion <br />structures during the mid-summer months of low-flow years when irrigation demands <br />are high. In some reaches, reduced water volume has lead to water quality <br />degradation by increasing the water temperature and elevating concentration <br />levels of human-produced and naturally occurring trace elements (e.g.. pesticides <br />and selenium) above the species tolerance threshold, and simplification or <br />elimination of adult habitats. During extreme low-water years, some reaches have <br />entirely been dewatered for several continuous days during summer months <br />resulting in loss of habitat, loss of migratory corridor, and possible stranding. <br />The Intent of the Recovery Implementation Program (RIP) is to bring abou. <br />the recovery and delisting of the endangered fishes while allowing upper basin <br />states to develop their entitled water under the Colorado River Compact. An <br />important component of the Recovery Program is the determination of flows needed <br />for recovery of these fishes. Furthermore, legal protection of sufficient <br />instream flaws for the maintenance and enhancement of riverine habitats to <br /> <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.