Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />r <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />of the lack of the right sizes of food organisms at the right time and in <br />sufficient quantity (Wydoski and Wick 1994). <br />Flooded bottomland habitats occur in broad valleys along low gradient <br />stream reaches. Bottomlands are off- or out-of-channel habitats that include <br />oxbow lakes, former side channels in broad valley floodplains, ponds, and wetland <br />depressions. During high flow events, some of these off-channel features were <br />temporarily connected to the river. Former natural riverine features could be <br />integrated back into the historic floodplain by removing portions of man-made <br />dikes or natural obstructions (e.g., gravel/sand bars). <br />Although gravel pits are artificial environments that are typically diked <br />and isolated from the mainstem river, they comprise a large proportion of pond <br />habitats created by gravel-pit mining in the floodplain in some river corridors <br />along the Upper Colorado River. Gravel mining operations along the Colorado <br />River in the Grand Valley between Palisade and Loma, Colorado (15- and 18-mile <br />reaches), between Rifle and Debeque, Colorado, and near Delta, Colorado on the <br />Gunnison River have created numerous gravel pits that vary in size, depth, shape, <br />and orientation to the mainstem river. For example, in the 100-year floodplain <br />from Palisade to Loma, approximately 15% of the total surface area (3,952 acres) <br />is comprised of ponded water created either from gravel mining or sewage <br />treatment plants (Unpublished data from the Bottomlands Survey and Inventory, <br />1994, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]). Though this percentage appears <br />to be low, historical aerial photos of this same area reveal very little gravel <br />mining activity as late as 1954 when less than 0.5% of the same area was <br />comprised of ponds. More importantly, these ponds are located in the former <br />floodplain. Even more dramatic is the approximate 15 miles of man-made dikes in <br />this 33-mile stream reach (Unpublished data from the Bottomlands Survey and <br />Inventory, 1994, USFWS) that effectively prevent inundation of potential off- <br />channel habitats and fish access to historic floodplain habitat. There were no <br />gravel pits either in 1954 (Appendix A: Photo 1) or in 1937 (Appendix A: Photo <br />2) and only 'virgin' floodplain existed where the 29-5/8 Road gravel-pit pond <br />site occurs today. <br />During high flow events, some of these ponds have been temporarily <br />connected to the river allowing access to fish. However, these ponds that do not <br />have permanent connections to the river have also trapped fish following <br />recession of high flows. Ponds that are reconnected to the river are less likely <br />to trap endangered fishes. Integrating ponds created from gravel-pit mining into <br />the historic floodplain by removing portions of dikes and re-establishing <br />connectivity to the river may provide off-channel habitats which are essential <br />for effective management of the riverine ecosystem and recovery of endangered <br />fishes. <br />Protection, restoration, and enhancement of inundated bottomland habitat <br />along mainstem riparian corridors are believed to be important for recovery of <br />razorback sucker. Riparian enhancement in the upper Colorado River basin can be <br />accomplished by providing sufficient flow to inundate bottomlands in a manner <br />that approximates the natural hydrograph. If sufficient flows cannot be obtained <br />regularly, dikes and levees should be breached at intervals to allow inundation <br />of lowlands during the spring high flow period. To reconnect floodplain habitat <br />where existing dikes occur, "set-back" dikes may have to be constructed to <br />