Laserfiche WebLink
ponds in wetlands adjacent to the river could be required to reconnect ponds to <br />the river when mining activities are completed as part of their reclamation <br />procedures. <br /> <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Fish and Wildlife Resources <br />Although the two ponds have never been thoroughly inventoried for fish <br />species, limited sampling has revealed the following non-native fishes occur <br />there: green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus), black bullhead (Ameiurus melas), carp <br />(Cyprinus carpio), fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Other riverine adult <br />fishes such as Colorado squawfish, flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis), <br />bluehead sucker (Catostomus discobolus), and roundtail chub (Gila robusta) have <br />used the smaller pond, especially during the high spring flows. Various species <br />of diving and dabbling ducks, Canada geese (Branta canadensis), and shorebirds <br />frequently use the various open water and shoreline habitats of the ponds. The <br />large cottonwoods along this stream reach provide roosting and resting areas for <br />wintering bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). Great blue herons (Ardea <br />herodias) also utilize these cottonwood groves. Ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus <br />colchicus) and Gambel's quail (Lophortyx gambelii) also occur on the property. <br />Northern leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) and bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) are <br />present on the property. The extent of other amphibians and reptiles on the <br />property is unknown. Beaver (Castor canadensis) and muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) <br />are located on the property. <br />Although Cooper and Severn (1994e) sampled the pond only once (October <br />1993) for water column and benthic invertebrates, they found low invertebrate <br />taxa richness. This could be due to lack of aquatic vegetation that has not had <br />an opportunity to establish in a pond because of recent gravel mining activities. <br />Now that gravel mining has been completed and reclamation procedures implemented, <br />aquatic vegetation may soon become established. Seasonal sampling of benthic <br />invertebrates and zooplankton will have to be made to determine seasonal <br />dynamics. <br />CONCEPTUAL ECOLOGICAL MODEL <br />Generally, the input of terrestrial organic matter provides the basis for <br />energy in headwater streams (Vannote et al. 1980). Large rivers, such as those <br />of the upper basin, depend upon fine particulate organic matter from upstream <br />reaches for basic productivity (Vannote et al. 1980; Sedell and Richey 1989). <br />Although detailed ecological studies of the various habitats in the upper basin <br />have not been made, inferences can be drawn from the published literature. Low- <br />water velocity habitats are important to endangered fishes of the upper Colorado <br />River basin in both historical and present occupied stream reaches. A discussion <br />of the importance of these habitats follows. <br />Relation of Nutrients, Sunlight Penetration, and Warm Water Temperatures <br />to Phytoplankton Production. Phytoplankton productivity provides the basis for <br />development of a food web. Phytoplankton production and standing crops increase <br />in concert with increases in annual input of nutrients regardless of latitude. <br />Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus are key elements for phytoplankton production. <br />10 <br />1