Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />the amount of lacustrine habitat should reduce the proliferation of non-native <br />piscivorous fishes while, at the same time, provide backwater habitat for <br />endangered fishes during spring runoff. Because the course of the river might <br />compromise the dike and wash out any back-fill added to the pond, the decision <br />was made to take a "wait-and-see" approach before committing resources to back- <br />fill the pond. At the downstream end of the pond, a portion of the dike would <br />be removed to construct a channel that would connect the pond to the river. <br />Stream Flows. Throughout the upper Colorado River basin dramatic physical <br />changes have been made to the riverine environment. Probably the most <br />significant change has been the alteration of natural flow regimes by water <br />development projects on the tributaries and mainstem rivers. Although many <br />private irrigation projects already existed, development of water storage in the <br />upper Colorado River basin began in earnest during the 1930's with the <br />construction of several projects by the Bureau of Reclamation. Reservoir <br />construction in the upper basin increased dramatically in the 1950's and 1960's <br />with the Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP). Regulated flows from high dams <br />and diversion structures upstream of historic bottomland areas remove water from <br />the river for municipal, industrial, and agricultural uses. These activities <br />have affected the main channel and, in some instances, eliminated-off-channel <br />habitats such as backwaters, embayments, and bottomlands as nursery areas for <br />some of the endangered fishes. The most noticeable change has been the reduction <br />in historic peak flows. <br />The "15-Mile Reach" of the Colorado River, where the 29-5/8 Road Gravel Pit <br />site is located, is influenced greatly by upstream water diversions. Osmundson <br />and Kaeding (1991) compared flow records from the historic or pre-water <br />development era (1902-1942) with the post-water development era. They calculated <br />that the mean peak flow in the "15-Mile Reach" of the Colorado River is now only <br />56% of the historic mean. The greatest loss of natural flows occurs during the <br />months of May (58%) and June (56%) that historically inundated the floodplain. <br />In essence, floodplains now are inundated less frequently, if at all. Prior to <br />1937, the annual peak flow at the State Line stream flow gage exceeded 30,000 cfs <br />81% of the time, and exceeded 40,000 cfs 56% of the time; in recent years (after <br />1965) peak flows exceeded 30,000 cfs 33% of the time, and exceeded 40,000 cfs <br />only eight per cent of the time (Figures 2 and 3). During the 16 years of <br />historic record, peak flows at the State Line gage were never less than 26,000 <br />cfs. From 1966 to 1990, peak flows have been less than 26,000 cfs, or about 58% <br />of the time. Therefore, what has changed is the loss of the regular high-volume <br />years, which are important to inundating off-channel habitats in floodplains. <br />Although it would be prudent to implement recommended river flows that <br />would inundate floodplains in the spring during May and June to provide off- <br />channel habitat, necessary flows might not be available frequently enough to <br />benefit recovery of the endangered fishes. Notching old dikes at strategic <br />locations while providing some level of protection from flooding to private <br />property and structure may be another strategy to provide access into off-channel <br />habitats for various life stages of endangered fishes. The U. S. Army Corps of <br />Engineers was recently given jurisdictional authority to regulate excavation of <br />fill material in wetland areas and below ordinary high water in riverine reaches <br />where critical habitat has been designated for endangered fishes. In the future, <br />as a condition of being granted a 404 permit, gravel mining companies that create <br />