My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7796
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7796
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:09:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7796
Author
Burdick, B. D.
Title
Conceptual Management Plan for Habitat Enhancement in Flooded Bottomlands, Escalante State Wildlife Area, Gunnison River Downstream of Delta, Colorado.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />' <br /> Spring flow is the most important annual event that shapes the channel, and <br /> thus, the habitat of the Gunnison River. High spring flows create and maintain <br />' the braided channels that provide a variety of important habitats for endangered <br /> and other native fis hes. High spring flows inundate the floodplain, providing <br /> annual nutrients via sediment deposition in the riparian corridor. Reduced flood <br />' frequency has had several repercussions to instream habitats as well as to <br />floodplain dynamics. Instream physical changes include, 1) gradual <br />simplification of the river channel--side channels and backwaters are lost <br />through silt deposition and are not available to native fishes, 2) sand bars are <br />' invaded by tamarisk which stabilizes them and makes them resistant to shifting, <br />and 3) gravel-cobble substrates become armored or imbedded with silt which <br />reduces their utility as spawning substrate for fish and habitat for a variety <br />' of macroinvertebrates. Changes to the floodplain include, 1) fewer backwaters <br />and oxbows being created and maintained, 2) reduced areas suitable for cottonwood <br />regeneration, 3) reduced frequency of a connection of the river with existing <br />' backwaters and oxbows, 4) reduced or complete loss of flushing of the floodplain <br />soils to remove salts (Cooper and Severn 1994c), and 5) reduced or eliminated <br />access to areas vital to survival of endangered fishes. <br />' Irrigation Practices at Escalante SWA. The Hamilton Tract has-water rights <br />from both the Don Quixote and Hartland Ditches. A surface irrigation return that <br />delivers administrative spill from the Hartland Ditch to the Gunnison River is <br />located on the eastern boundary of Site 1 at the Escalante SWA. Irrigation water <br />used for private agricultural purposes to the north of the Hamilton Tract returns <br />via diffuse subsurface routes through the tract. <br />Fish and Wildlife Resources <br />' During 1992 and 1993, the warmwater stream reaches of the Gunnison River <br />from the North Fork of the Gunnison River to the confluence with the Colorado <br />River near Grand Junction were intensively inventoried by the USFWS. Eighteen <br />fish species and three catostomid hybrids were captured during this sampling. <br />In the immediate area of the Escalante SWA, three native fish species, <br />flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus Iatipinnis), bluehead sucker (Catostomus <br />discobolus), and roundtail chub (Gila robusta) comprised about 80% of all fish <br />encountered in the reach. Other non-native fishes that were frequently collected <br />included carp (Cyprinus carpio), fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas), red shiner <br />(Cyprinella lutrensis), and white sucker (Catostomus commersoni). Other non- <br />native fish that were occasionally captured in off-channel, low-velocity habitats <br />included green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus), black bullhead (Ameiurus melas), and <br />northern pike (Esox lucius). These three non-native game fishes that thrive in <br />' low-velocity habitats in the Gunnison River could hamper endangered fish recovery <br />efforts because they may potentially prey upon young razorback sucker and other <br />native fishes. <br />Presently, there are two small impounded areas within Site 1 that could <br />become connected to the river via the spillway at the downstream outlet during <br />high spring flows. However, it is unlikely that any fish species could survive <br />' for extended periods because these two areas are too shallow and probably lack <br />sufficient dissolved oxygen. These two depressions probably remain wetted by <br />irrigation returns from private agricultural fields to the north. It is possible <br />1 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.