Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />The stream reach (river mile 50-60) in the Delta area on the Gunnison <br />River may also be a candidate site for experimental stocking of razorback <br />sucker. This reach appears to be the last location where large numbers of <br />razorback sucker were known to occupy the Gunnison River (Wiltzius 1978). <br />This reach also contains relatively abundant side channel and backwater <br />habitats and native suckers and roundtail chub are numerous and non-native <br />predaceous fishes are less abundant than in other reaches. Channel catfish <br />are virtually nonexistent upstream of Redlands Diversion Dam (Valdez et al. <br />1982; unpublished USFWS data [one channel catfish, total length = 644 mm, <br />weight = 3,250 g, was captured at river mile 17, July 1992]). Although this <br />reach is impacted by water diversions and peak spring flows have been reduced <br />by upstream dams of the Aspinall Unit, these dams may provide a mechanism to <br />deliver flows downstream to manage the recovery of razorback sucker in the <br />Gunnison River. <br />To increase the likelihood that a sufficient number of stocked fish will <br />survive to allow for an evaluation of stocking success, fish may have to be <br />released at multiple sites within the river reach targeted for stocking. <br />Rearing Sites <br />Natural backwaters are important habitats for razorback sucker in the <br />upper Colorado River (Valdez and Wick 1981). These fish use these quiet areas <br />during various life stages. Habitat enhancement of natural riverine features <br />may play an important role in an augmentation program and has been suggested <br />as a means to assist the recovery of the razorback sucker (Valdez and Wick <br />1981). Existing side channels, tributaries, and old river oxbows could be <br />utilized as either seasonal backwaters or managed as year-round rearing <br />habitats. For example, side channels diked for flood control in the Yampa <br />24 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br /> <br />4