Laserfiche WebLink
ISMP backwater sampling evaluation <br />where largemouth bass density was number of fish per 10 m2. Habitat complexity was not a <br />significant effect in this model. Re-ordering the logistic equation to yield probability of <br />detection given an investigator-chosen largemouth bass density was of the form: <br />1 <br /> <br />py = <br />1 + exp(1.781 - 3.065(largemouth bass density)) <br />(2) <br />where largemouth bass density was number of fish per 10 m2. This relationship assumes average <br />backwater depth and habitat features for backwaters in the Colorado River in the Grand Valley. <br />Solutions to the logistic regression equation over a range of bass abundance values suggested that <br />the probability that the ISMP technique would detect bass in a backwater was relatively low even <br />when bass were abundant (Fig. 10). For example, a 50 % probability of detection was achieved <br />only after largemouth bass abundance exceeded 0.58 fish per 10 m2 surface area in an average <br />size backwater. Assuming that the average backwater surface area in the Grand Valley in 1997 <br />and 1998 was 718 m2, this equates to an abundance level of 42 bass to achieve a 50 % probability <br />of detection. The positive intercept in this relationship suggested that there was a small <br />probability of detecting bass with ISMP sampling when estimated abundance was low. <br />A similar logistic regression analysis conducted for green sunfish suggested that detection <br />probabilities of ISMP sampling increased as green sunfish density increased (p < 0.0001). <br />Habitat complexity was not a significant effect in this model, which had the form: <br />logit Y= -1.5935 + 2.7317(green sunfish density), <br />(3) <br />-13-