My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6022
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
6022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:07:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6022
Author
Bulkley, R. V., Charles R. Berry, Jr., Richard Pimental and Tamara Black.
Title
Tolerance and Preferences of Colorado River Endangered Fishes To Selected Habitat Parameters
USFW Year
1981.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Completion Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a <br />v <br />Page <br />a <br />a <br />0 <br />0 <br />v <br />0 <br />a <br />0 <br />0 <br />10. Relationship of preferred temperature (mean of <br />individual modes) to acclimation temperature <br />for Colorado squawfish. Final preferendum is the <br />point of intersection with the 45° line (ie. that <br />point where selected temperature = acclimation <br />temperature). Open circles represent juvenile <br />fish; solid circles adult fish ............................. 37 <br />11. Relative frequency distribution of juvenile Colorado <br />squawfish in 8 compartments of TDS gradient device <br />(Figure 2) with and without gradient established. <br />Numbers I, II, and III are replicates for controls <br />and treatments. Number over vertical bar is conduc- <br />tivity in mmhos. Data on location and conductivity <br />are values 24 hr after start of experiment ................. 42 <br />12. Relative frequency distribution of juvenile bonytail <br />chubs in 8 compartments of TDS gradient device <br />(Figure 2) with and without gradient established. <br />Numbers I, II, and III are replicates for controls <br />and treatments. Number over vertical bar is conduc- <br />tivity in mmhos. Data on location and conductivity <br />are values 24 hr after start of experiment .................. 44 <br />1-3. Relative frequency distribution in 8 compartments <br />of the TDS gradient device for pooled data from <br />three treatments and three controls for each <br />species. Numbers above vertical bar are the range <br />of conductivity (mmhos) for that compartment over <br />the three treatments (Figures 11 and 12). ... ••••..•.•..... 45 <br />14. Relative frequency distribution of juvenile humpback <br />chubs in 8 compartments to TDS gradient device <br />(Figure 2) with and without gradient established. <br />Numbers I, II, and III are replicates for controls <br />and treatments. Number over vertical bar is conduc- <br />tivity in mmhos. Data on location and conductivity <br />are values 24 hr after start of experiment, <br />N = 20, 8-12-cm fish/replicate... 47 <br />15. Relative frequency distribution of juvenile <br />humpback chubs in 8 compartments to TDS gradient <br />device (Figure 2) with and without gradient <br />established. Numbers I, II, and III are <br />replicates for controls and treatments. Number <br />over vertical bar is conductivity in mmhos. <br />Data on location and conductivity are values <br />24 hr after start of experiment. N = 20 <br />8-12-cm fish/replicate. Concentrations were <br />double those of previous tests .............................. 48 <br />10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.