My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9499
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9499
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:07:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9499
Author
Osmundson, D. B.
Title
Removal of Non-native Centrarchids from Upper Colorado River Backwaters, 1999-2001
USFW Year
2003.
USFW - Doc Type
Summary of Results.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
may partly be attributed to different periods in which data were collected. However, <br />Trammel et al. (2002) similarly reported comparatively few captures of centrarchids in <br />Grand Valley backwaters when seines were used during 1999-2001 (total of 729 <br />centrarchids captured), the same period in which electrofishing removal efforts were <br />conducted. Hence, the disparity in numbers captured may largely be attributable to gear <br />type used. Indeed, Bundy and Bestgen (2001) and Trammel et al. (2002) reported that <br />seines are an ineffective means to sample centrarchids in upper Colorado River <br />backwaters. Electrofishing, specifically barge electrofishing, was found here to be a <br />fairly effective means for capturing centrarchids: a total of 14,874 was captured during a <br />three-year period, or 20 times the total captured by Trammel et al. using seines during <br />the same time period. In addition, the habitats targeted by barge electrofishing included <br />some backwaters that were seasonally isolated from the main channel and therefore <br />would not typically be sampled during ISMP-type seining surveys. These habitats were <br />more pond-like in appearance and may have provided better habitat for centrarchids than <br />more typical backwaters open to the river and generally devoid of vegetation. <br />The ISMP 1986-2001 seining catch rates suggest lower densities of centrarchids <br />in backwaters during the 1999-2001 period than during the preceding year (1998). This <br />could be interpreted as an indication that removal efforts from this project as well as <br />those of Trammell et al. (2002) during the 1999-2001 period had a reach-wide depletive <br />effect. However, catch rates of largemouth bass and green sunfish during the ISMP 16- <br />yr period of record suggest relative abundance of both species often fluctuate by several <br />orders of magnitude annually with or without removal efforts occurring (Fig. 9). Other <br />variables therefore greatly influence densities, or seining catch rate, of these species in <br />backwaters. Hence, it is difficult to draw cause-and-effect conclusions from the ISMP <br />results regarding removal impacts on mean annual seining catch rates, and the question <br />remains as to whether ISMP catch rates would have declined between 1998 and 1999 if <br />removal efforts had not occurred. <br />Based on barge electrofishing catch rates (mean number removed per backwater), <br />no reach-wide depletive effect was evident from one year to the next during the three- <br />year project. The absence of any noticeable depletion of largemouth bass and green <br />20
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.