Laserfiche WebLink
Additional calculations were required to determine the effect of regulation on annual <br />peak flows at the Cameo gauge. Linear regression was used to calculate the relationship <br />between total yield during the April-July period and the magnitude of average discharge on <br />the peak runoff day (Fig. 6). This relationship was derived by using a block of years that <br />occurred prior to the development of most regulation in the upper Colorado River basin <br />(i.e., preceding construction of Green Mountain Reservoir; Liebermann et al. 1989) and for <br />which monthly yield and peak discharge records were available (1902-1942). The <br />unregulated annual peak discharges at Cameo and the unregulated annual total yield for the <br />April-July period at Cameo as calculated by NRCS for the 1958-1997 period were then <br />predicted using this relationship. <br />To facilitate comparisons between average monthly discharges of regulated and <br />unregulated flows at Cameo, the 1958-1997 block of years was first divided into four <br />precipitation categories based on the total annual (Jan-Dec) unregulated yield at Cameo. <br />60 <br />t 50 <br />6 <br />U) 40 <br />C <br />W <br />Ch <br />6 30 <br />L <br />H <br />0 20 <br />10 <br />a <br />0 <br />%0 . <br />• <br />' y = 1483.21 + 0.01067 x <br />r2=0.78 P<.0001 <br />0 1 2 3 4 5 <br />Apr-Jul Yield (millions of acre ft) <br />Figure 6. Relationship between total yield at Cameo during the April-July runoff period and <br />the average discharge of the peak day. Data are from the 1902-1942 period of record; <br />1934-1942 data are from USGS gage at Cameo; 1902-1933 data are from USGS gage at <br />Palisade with estimates of Government Highline Canal diversion depletions added back. <br />Monthly yields (acre feet) were calculated from average monthly discharge (mean cfs x days <br />in month x 1.9835). <br />32