My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9413
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9413
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:07:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9413
Author
Osmundson, D. B.
Title
Flow Regimes for Restoration and Maintenance of Sufficient Habitat to Recover Endangered Razorback Sucker and Colorado Pikeminnow in the Upper Colorado River.
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
are formed. Deposits of cobble and gravel can also create islands resulting in multi-thread <br />channels or complex river reaches. Often associated with multi-channel sites are riffles at <br />the upstream end and sometimes pools at either the downstream end or to one side of the <br />riffle. Backwaters are formed at the downstream end of some side channels when inflow at <br />the upstream end ceases or is reduced as runoff flows subside. Eddies form at the interface <br />of the backwater mouth and the main channel. Thus, lateral movement of the channel <br />during high flow events is the process responsible for channel complexity and the creation <br />of preferred mesohabitats (Pitlick et al. 1999). <br />Adult Colorado pikeminnow in the Grand Valley prefer segments of river that <br />contain a diversity of habitat types. Partitioning the river into 0.65-km segments from <br />Loma to Palisade, Osmundson and Kaeding (1991) categorized segments as either simple <br />(single-thread) or complex (multi-thread or containing backwaters), and found that the river <br />consisted of about equal proportions of the two segment types. During radiotelemetry <br />studies, adults were located in complex segments 85% of the time during spring; 71%, <br />during summer; 62%, during winter. These complex segments are preferred presumably <br />because they contain more of the preferred mesohabitats (pools, eddies and backwaters) <br />than do simple segments (primarily consisting of fast and slow runs) and because a variety <br />of habitat types juxtaposed to one another allows more efficient exploitation of resources, <br />i.e., feeding and resting habitats are close together (Osmundson and Kaeding 1991). <br />Osmundson et al. (1995) selected four complex sub-reaches within the 15-mile reach <br />for habitat mapping during 1990-1991. The reaches selected were those heavily used by <br />adult Colorado pikeminnow. At a moderate base flow (1,630 cfs), backwaters comprised <br />5% of the total water surface area of the four sub-reaches; pools comprised 6%; eddies, <br />0.4%; riffles, 25%; slow runs, 56%; fast runs, 7%; rapids, 0.5%. Thus, even in complex <br />reaches, a small percentage of the total wetted channel area is comprised of non-run <br />habitats; the preference by adult Colorado pikeminnow for such sites underscores the <br />importance of creating and maintaining such features. <br />When flow is reduced and sediment input remains the same, fine-sediment <br />-deposition occurs in low velocity sites such as side channels, backwaters and the river <br />margin. Osmundson et al. (1995) and Van Steeter (1996) documented the deposition of <br />22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.