My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8112
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:06:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8112
Author
Osmundson, D. B. and B. K. Scheer.
Title
Monitoring Cobble-Gravel Embeddedness in the Streambed of the Upper Colorado River, 1996-1997.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
lucius) also appears to experience limitations in food availability and reproductive success. <br />Despite extensive research on various aspects of the life history of this fish, the effects of <br />sedimentation on reproductive success and on food base productivity have been largely <br />ignored. However, the Colorado River is highly susceptible to sedimentation problems. <br />Primarily because of considerable water development in the headwaters, the frequency of <br />flows capable of mobilizing the armour layer in reaches occupied by the Colorado squawfish <br />has been significantly reduced (Osmundson and Kaeding 1991, Van Steeter and Pitlick 1998). <br />In the 15-mile reach upstream of the Colorado River's confluence with the Gunnison River, <br />the frequency of years with peak flows capable of fully mobilizing the bed (- 566 cros <br />[20,000 cfs]; Van Steeter 1996) have declined from 77 percent to 34 percent from the early <br />part of the century to more recent times (Fig. 2). Conversely, the frequency of years with <br />peak flows incapable of initiating bed movement (< 283 cros [10,000 cfs]; Van Steeter 1996) <br />has increased from zero to 23 percent. Mlhous (1998) found that the frequency of flushing <br />events in the Gunnison River, a major tributary of the Colorado River, has also declined <br />dramatically since major water development projects in the headwaters were put on line: the <br />frequency of years with flows capable of flushing fines from riffles has decreased from 68 <br />percent to 25 percent. <br />While peak flows have declined in both rivers, sediment inputs probably have not. Due to <br />grazing and irrigation practices, sediment inputs are likely to be at least as high today than <br />during presettlement times. When storage projects are located in the headwaters above major <br />sources of sediment, as in the Colorado River, they have little effect on reducing sediment <br />delivery to downstream segments. Coupled with a reduced flow regime, sediment input rates <br />are likely to exceed transport rates and depositional problems (aggradation) are likely to <br />occur with time (Reiser et al. 1989, Van Steeter and Pitlick 1998). In years of exceptionally <br />high runoff, enormous quantities of accumulated fine sediment is released from the bed and is <br />deposited on the tops of bars, islands and the adjacent floodplain. After such times cobble- <br />bed habitats become exceptionally clean and free of fine sediment and are widespread in <br />occurrence (Fig. 3). How often such flushing flows must occur to maintain these relatively <br />clean bed conditions is as yet unknown. Because Colorado squawfish spawn in localized, <br />geomorphically anomalous sites (Harvey et al. 1993), this study does not attempt to monitor <br />or address the issue of sedimentation of spawning substrates; rather, our objective is to <br />characterize more widespread substrate conditions primarily relevant to maintaining <br />productivity of riverine food webs. <br />METHODS <br />The general study area was located in the Grand Valley; this area was selected for three <br />reasons: 1) its importance as a concentration area for adult Colorado squawfish, 2) its <br />abundance of cobble/gravel based habitats, 3) its close proximity to our field station. <br />Sampling sites were divided among the 15-mile reach (upstream of the Gunnison River <br />confluence) and the 18-mile reach (immediately downstream of the confluence). This allowed <br />for comparisons between reaches to determine if embeddedness might be influenced by the <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.