Laserfiche WebLink
adults probably spawn, no young have been reported in the upper Colorado <br />River in the past 27 years and captures of adults in the Grand Valley have <br />decreased dramatically in the last 17 years (Fig. 12 and Appendix Table <br />IV). Our evaluation of existing information leads us to believe that the <br />decline of this fish is linked to the reduction in spring flows. <br />Razorback suckers spawn in spring. It is not known whether gonadal matura- <br />tion and degree of ripeness is primarily controlled by photoperiod or <br />water temperature. Bulkley and Pimentel (1983) found that the preferred <br />temperature of adults is between 22.9 and 24.8 C. Hamman (1985) suggested <br />that egg incubation temperature was a critical factor in the reproductive <br />cycle of the razorback sucker; his work and that of Inslee (1982) indicat- <br />ed that optimum temperatures for reproduction were 20-22 C. Marsh (1985) <br />250 <br />200 <br />CC 150 <br />W <br />m <br />100 <br />Z <br />50 <br />0 <br />74 75 76 79 80 81 82 85 86 87 88 <br />YEAR <br />Figure 12. Razorback sucker captures from the Colorado River between Loma <br />and Palisade, Colorado (RM 152.8-185.1), 1974-1990. Effort among years was <br />not constant. Individuals captured upstream or downstream of the Grand <br />Valley are not included. Missing years are due to either no effort expend- <br />ed (1977-1978), or no fish caught despite minimal effort (1983 and 1989) <br />or extensive effort (1984 and 1990). Data from Appendix Table IV. <br />38