Laserfiche WebLink
others; at the same time, high flows may be the only available means by <br />which to reduce production of several prolific and potentially detrimental <br />introduced species. <br />Reduction of Historic Peak Flows <br />During recent times, spring flows in the Colorado and Gunnison rivers have <br />been significantly reduced as a result of upstream water development . <br />projects, primarily transmountain diversions and reservoir storage. Large <br />changes in the upper Colorado River first began during the 1943-1953 <br />period when various storage and diversion facilities related to the Colo- <br />rado-Big Thompson Project were being put on line. Closure of the first <br />dam, Green Mountain, was in fall 1942; closure of the last western slope <br />dam associated with the project, Willow Creek, was in spring 1953 (Water <br />and Power Reasources 1981). Though other projects built since this period <br />have further impacted Colorado River flows, we felt this was a reasonable <br />block of years to use for separating historic from recent periods for <br />comparison purposes. When we compared yearly discharge records for the 36 <br />years following this period with the 41 years prior to this period for <br />which records exist, we found that the mean peak flow in the 15-mile reach <br />is now only 56 percent of the pre-development mean (Table 4, Fig. 6 and <br />Appendix Table I). Major changes have also occurred in the Gunnison River <br />basin, which affects flows of the Colorado River downstream of the 15-mile <br />reach. During the 24 years since completion of Blue Mesa and Morrow Point <br />reservoirs in 1966, the mean yearly peak flow at the mouth of the Gunnison <br />River has been reduced to 52 percent of that which occurred prior to <br />completion of the f'_rst major water project in the Gunnison River head- <br />waters (Taylor Reservoir in 1937). <br />27