Laserfiche WebLink
/1 <br />N <br />:E1 .20 <br />15 <br />LU <br />U <br />Q .10 <br />w <br />2 <br />U .05 <br />w <br />2 0 <br />O <br />w <br />O <br />REACH 1 <br />85 <br />86 T <br />1 <br />87 <br />ss? 1 r as 84 <br />I 82 ?? I <br />10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 <br />MAXIMUM-ANNUAL DISCHARGE (CFS X 1000) <br />Figure 3. Plot of geometric-mean catch-per-effort (C/E) versus maximum- <br />annual discharge for post-larval Colorado squawfish collected during <br />October, Colorado River, 1982-1988. Lines indicate ± 1 standard error. <br />Figure from McAda and Kaeding (1989). Reach 1 includes Colorado river- <br />miles 0-110 (confluence with the Green River to lower end of Westwater <br />Canyon). <br />rounding to the nearest 10,000 cfs, therefore recommended a peak discharge <br />of 30,000-40,000 cfs (measured at the State line) to maximize production <br />of young Colorado squawfish. <br />New Information <br />We similarly analyzed data on larvae collected during July and August and <br />post-larval fish collected during late September from three river reaches <br />in the Grand Valley: the 15-mile reach, the lower 18-mile reach, and the <br />Gunnison River downstream of the Redlands Diversion. Sampling methods were <br />previously described in Osmundson and Kaeding (1989) and U.S. Fish and <br />15