Laserfiche WebLink
N <br />M 0.8 <br />B <br />E <br />R o.e <br />P <br />R 0.4 <br />H <br />O 0.2 <br />U <br />R <br />0 <br />1986 <br />N <br />M ae <br />B <br />E <br />R ae <br />P <br />E <br />R as <br />H <br />0 0.2 <br />R <br />N <br />U <br />M <br />B <br />E <br />R <br />P <br />E <br />R <br />H <br />O <br />U <br />R <br />00-15 CO-18 00-15 CO-18 00-15 00-18 GU-2.2 00-15 00-18 GU-2.2 <br />COLORADO SOUAWFISH RAZORBACK SUCKER 001-ORAUO SOUAWFISH RAZORBACK SUCKER <br />N <br />U a <br />M <br />B <br />E <br />R a <br />P <br />E <br />R a <br />H <br />O a <br />U <br />R <br />OD-15 CO-18 GU-2.2 00-15 CO-tB GU-22 00-18 GU-2.2 CO-15 CO-18 GU-2.2 <br />COLORADO SOUANFISH RAZORBACK SUCKER COLORADO SOUAWFISH RAZORBACK SUCKER <br />0 <br />Figure 2. Electrofishing catch per effort for Colorado squawfish and <br />razorback sucker in three contiguous river reaches during spring, 1986, <br />1987 and 1988. River reach codes: CO-15 = Colorado River 15-mile reach <br />(RM 171-185); CO-18 = Colorado River 18-mile reach (RM 153-171); GU-2.2 = <br />Gunnison River 2.2-mile reach (RM 0.8-3.0). Note: the Gunnison River was <br />not sampled in 1986. <br />section (RM 174.4-175.7) of the 15-mile reach during spring and to the <br />plunge pool of the Gunnison River during summer. Radio-tracking data on <br />the movement of adult Colorado squawfish, reported below, also support <br />this conclusion. In 1988, however, extremely low flows in the lower <br />Gunnison apparently precluded use of this reach by Colorado squawfish: <br />extensive electrofishing (as well as radiotelemetry) effort failed to <br />reveal the presence of any individuals there during July-October. No <br />razorbacks were seen in the lower Gunnison during our sampling efforts in <br />either year. <br />11