Laserfiche WebLink
fl <br />t <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />I <br />1 <br />1 <br />t <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />[7 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />LJ <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />Back round <br />The range of the Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus Lucius) and razorback <br />sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) has been reduced by about 75% since the turn of <br />the century (Seethaler 1978, McAda and Wydoski 1980). Although both fish <br />are rare in their remaining habitat, only the Colorado squawfish is feder- <br />ally listed as 'endangered', despite the fact that the razorback is con- <br />siderably more rare than the squawfish and may be near extirpation in <br />nature (Tyus 1987). The razorback sucker is protected by the states of <br />Utah, Colorado, Arizona, Nevada and California. <br />Colorado squawfish are restricted to the upper basin of the Colorado River <br />system above Glen Canyon Dam, inhabiting the Colorado and Green rivers and <br />various large tributaries. The razorback sucker is also largely restrict- <br />ed to the upper basin, though a remnant population of old adults persists <br />in Lake Mohave, a lower basin reservoir. <br />Loss of habitat for these rare fishes has occurred over many years. <br />Construction of dams and diversions has had a major impact by altering <br />natural flow and temperature regimes. Habitat in the lower basin has been <br />altered to such an extent that it no longer supports self-sustaining <br />populations of Colorado squawfish or razorback sucker (Minckley 1973, <br />1983). Although the upper basin supports populations of the endangered <br />fishes, their continued existence there is far from assured. Because <br />demands for municipal and agricultural water continue to increase, the <br />accompanying loss of suitable habitat for these fishes in the upper basin <br />may be paralleling that which occurred in the lower basin. In the upper