Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />During 1987, two composite rainbow trout samples were taken from <br />Hotchkiss National Fish Hatchery to be analyzed for trace element <br />contaminants. Comparisons were made between these values (Table 1), and <br />contaminant levels found in four Colorado squawfish (Table 2) which were <br />captured from the White River in July-August 1986, and held at Hotchkiss <br />hatchery for approximately 8-9 months until they died in April 1987. <br />Arsenic levels were elevated in Hotchkiss hatchery trout samples (Table <br />1) at 0.99 and 1.2 ug/g dry weight, when compared to the 1980-81 National <br />Contaminants Biomonitoring Program (NCBP) 85th-percentile concentration (Lowe <br />et al 1985) of 0.88 ug/g dry weight. Colorado squawfish #1 and #2 also had <br />high arsenic values of 0.96 and 0.84 ug/g dry weight, respectively. However, <br />Colorado squawfish #3 and #4 had arsenic values equal to or below the NCBP <br />mean of 0.46 and 0.55 ug/g dry weight, respectively. Colorado squawfish may <br />have accumulated arsenic from either food or water at Hotchkiss hatchery, <br />though they could also have accumulated arsenic from the White River. <br />Arsenic levels occurring in the two hatchery rainbow trout samples were <br />below the suggested value of <0.5 mg arsenic per kg of total dry weight <br />consumed by people (Eisler 1988), when considering an average fish weight of <br />440 g and 75% moisture (0.132 mg As/fish dry wt). Also, these arsenic values <br />were from whole fish samples, and because the liver accumulates the highest <br />arsenic concentration when compared to other tissues (Oladmeji et al 1984), <br />actual levels of arsenic consumed by people would most likely be less than <br />those mentioned above. <br />Moore and Ramamoorthy (1984) note that toxic inorganic arsenicals are <br />rapidly transformed to organic arsenic in fish, and these organic forms are <br />readily excreted by humans and are of low toxicity. They suggest that the 0.5 <br />mg/kg standard may not be consistent with possible hazards posed to humans.