Laserfiche WebLink
For bluehead and flannelmouth suckers, condition was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in spring <br />1994 than in spring 1995. For bluehead suckers, condition during fall 1994 was significantly <br />lower than in fall 1995. For flannelmouth suckers, condition during fall was similar between <br />years. Roundtail chub condition during fall was similar between years as was condition during <br />spring. <br />To determine if condition in spring was related to seasonal enlargement of gonadal tissues, <br />mean condition of immature and mature fish was compared. For all three species, condition <br />of mature and immature fish during spring was not significantly different (Figure 12; Appendix <br />Table 14). This was partly true for fall also. During fall of both years, condition of mature <br />and immature roundtail chubs was similar. This was also the case for bluehead and <br />flannelmouth suckers in fall 1994, but not in 1995, when immature fish condition was <br />significantly higher than that of mature fish. <br />Diet of Native Fish <br />Among-Species Variation <br />Miscellaneous organic debris made up the largest portion of the diet (by volume) for each of <br />the three species examined (Figures 13-15). This mostly consisted of fibrous particles of <br />vascular plant tissue and sometimes filamentous algae. Bluehead sucker diets contained the <br />most organic debris (83 %), followed by flannelmouth sucker (55 %) and roundtail chub (43 <br />%).' Invertebrates were the second most common food item of bluehead and flannelmouth <br />suckers. Flannelmouth sucker diets contained a greater percentage of invertebrates than <br />bluehead sucker diets (41% versus 16%). In bluehead sucker diets, chironomid larvae made <br />up about half of the volume of invertebrates; in flannelmouth sucker diets, a third. <br />Ephemeropteran and trichopteran larvae were important components of diets of both sucker <br />species. In bluehead sucker diets, simulid larvae were also important; in flannelmouth sucker <br />diets, chironomid pupae and plecopteran larvae were also important. <br />The primary difference between the diets of roundtail chub and the suckers was the <br />consumption of fish by roundtail chubs (Figure 15). Organic debris and algae made up <br />approximately 57 % of the roundtail chub diet; fish made up 29 %; invertebrates, 12 %. Most <br />of the fish remains in the diet consisted of unidentifiable parts; cyprinids made up most of <br />those that could be identified. Ephemeropteran and trichopteran larvae were important <br />components of the invertebrate portion of the roundtail chub diet. <br />'Diets of these three native species, as depicted in Figures 13-15, were derived by weighting the diet of fish from <br />each strata according to how abundant the species was in that strata. The graphs thus depict diets of the overall <br />population, i.e., those strata with the highest catch rates of a given species have the most influence on the overall <br />diet. Diets of fish within each strata were averaged (strata averages for each period were then averaged across <br />periods) and catch rates from the fall 1994, and spring and fall 1995 electrofishing efforts (periods averaged) were <br />used for weighting. <br />24