Laserfiche WebLink
< 300 mm TL would be vulnerable to predation by many adult Colorado pikeminnow. In <br />calculating catch rates, we pooled numbers of all species, native and nonnative, excepting <br />spined fish (channel catfish and black bullhead) which we assumed to be largely invulnerable <br />to predation. Comparisons of catch rates among strata, among sampling periods, and between <br />habitat types were made using ANOVA on log-transformed (In) data and the Tukey-Kramer <br />multiple comparison test. <br />All strata within the Gunnison River were not sampled as part of this study, primarily because <br />this area had recently (1992-1994) been sampled (e.g. Burdick 1995) and data were therefore <br />already available. Stratification of the Gunnison River by Burdick was similar to that done for <br />this study. Also, electrofishing equipment used in the two studies were the same. However, <br />the years of study were different (one overlapping year), the sampling seasons were somewhat <br />different between studies, and the length and number of study reaches within strata were <br />different (Burdick had only one reach 9 km long). My goal was to link the earlier sampling <br />results to this study while accommodating the differences in technique between the two <br />studies. To do this, the techniques used for the Colorado River strata in this study were used <br />on one Gunnison River stratum to allow a direct comparison with the Colorado River strata <br />results. Burdick's 1992-1994 data for four Gunnison River strata (between Redlands and <br />Hartland diversion dams) were then partitioned in the manner used in this study and his results <br />for this one stratum (sampled in both studies) were then compared with the other three <br />Gunnison River strata sampled only during his study. Stratum 12 of this study corresponds to <br />Stratum 4 (Bridgeport to Escalante) in the Burdick study. <br />Body Condition <br />Comparisons of fish relative body condition (Kn) among strata and among seasons were also <br />used as a means to assess food availability. My analysis focused on the three common soft- <br />rayed, fusiform, native species that likely serve as forage for large adult Colorado pikeminnow <br />(> 550 mm TL): bluehead sucker Catostomus discobolus, flannelmouth sucker C. latipinnis, <br />and roundtail chub Gila robusta. As noted by Hawkins (1992), relative condition (Kn) is a <br />better statistic than is the more widely used Fulton's condition factor (K) because relative <br />condition is comparable between fish of different lengths; Fulton's condition factor does not <br />account for allometric growth and therefore varies by fish length making comparisons among <br />sizes inappropriate (see Le Cren 1951). Relative condition is the observed mass (K) of a <br />given fish divided by the expected mass (Me) for a fish of its length: <br />Kn = M * 100 <br />A <br />The expected mass (Me) is calculated using constants derived from length-weight regressions: <br />Log,Af., _ ((Log,o length) slope) + y-intercept <br />6