Laserfiche WebLink
14 <br /> <br />The dynamics of the system involving the replacement of cobbles as <br />they are plucked away in short sprints is the genesis of a clean <br />substrate. Cobble motion is initiated on differential basis, the <br />smaller sizes moving first until at extreme flows, all except the very <br />largest sizes may move. Historical tracting of a given cobble would <br />reveal a slow, tedious progression of the cobbles over the bar with the <br />movement consisting of short hops and jumps. Cobbles entrained in the - <br />flow on a riffle, however, will probably be carried through the pool to <br />the next riffle with eventual deposition on the upstream adverse slope. <br />Pool constrictions experience greater incremental increases in depth and <br />velocity which will insure cobble motion to the next riffle. When <br />relatively large cobbles have deposited in a riffle, the propensity for <br />other particles to join increases. <br />Maintenance of dynamic equilibrium requires progressive adjustment <br />of slope and spatial variation. Bars tend to be energy dissipating <br />structures that promote overall channel stability. Energy expediture <br />per unit bed area is equalized with mobilization of cobbles and <br />localized width and depth adjustment. Channels around cobbles bars are <br />reformed with failing side slopes and changing widths. At peak flows <br />vertical accretion of the cobble bar is an example of depth adjustment. <br />Such accretion, forces additional flow to impinge on the banks and <br />create side channels of high velocity and unstable beds. <br />Historical Flow and Flood Frequency Analysis <br />USGS gaging stations are located at Maybell on the Yampa River and <br />Lilly on the Little Snake, approximately 40 and 15 miles upstream of <br />Dinosaur National Monument, respectively. No substantial tributary <br />inflow or stream losses occur in the intervening reach and therefore, <br />the gaging station flows represent the inflow to the Monument. On the <br />average, the USGS discharge computed by combining the discharge at the <br />stations is slightly higher than that discharge measured at Mathers Hole <br />(see Figure 6). This comparison is only relative, however, being a <br />function of the flow travel time, the time of day that the discharge <br />measurements are made and the magnitude of the unsteadiness of the flow. <br />The average difference of 6.5% (absolute) between the discharges gives <br />credibility to stage-discharge relationship at Mathers Hole. <br />The 1983 Yampa River discharge and the mean annual discharge are <br />shown in Figures 7 and 8. The mean annual discharge was calculated <br />using the period 1941-83. The period from 1922-83 constitutes the <br />entire period of record. The first 20 years of this record were wetter <br />than the remaining 40, and the 1941-83 period is more representative of <br />the conditions that exist today in the Yampa River (USGS, John Elliott, <br />personal communication, 2/83). Table I reveals the marked difference <br />between the periods. The lower discharge period, 1941-1983, has a mean <br />water yield of 1,483,700 acre-feet, compared to 1,508,400 acre-feet for <br />the entire period of record. <br />Figures 9 and 10 are plots of the five and ten year running average <br />of the annual volumes of the Yampa River at Deerlodge. The climate was <br />drier than normal from about 1935 through 1965. The 1920's and 1965- <br />1975 are wet periods which offset the dry period in the 1930's and 40's.