Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ? l <br />10 y , . <br />limbs; 28 sets of sediment data were collected on the rising limb and 15 <br />sets on the falling limb. The sediment samples were supplemented with <br />measurements of water surface slope, river width, cross section profiles <br />and velocity. <br />Suspended sediment samples were collected at ten foot verticls with <br />a U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) D-74 depth integrating, suspended - <br />sediment sampler using the ETR (Equal Transit Rate) method. The Helley- <br />Smith sampler was employed to collect unmeasured sediment zone samples <br />near the bed. It was operated at each vertical in conjunction with the <br />D-74 sampler. The Helley-Smith is not a sanctioned sampler by the USGS <br />but represents the best available technology for bedload and unmeasured <br />suspended zone sampling. Of the forty-three sets of sediment samples, <br />forty-two Helley-Smith samples and thirty-nine sets of suspended <br />sediment were collected. <br />Discharge measurements were facilitated in 1983 by erecting a staff <br />gage. A stage-discharge relationship was calibrated with 24 measure- <br />ments over the two field seasons. The Mathers Hole cross section <br />becomes a more effective conveyor of discharge at higher stages which <br />results in the nonlinear stage-discharge relationship shown in Figure 5. <br />Discharge was measured from 600 cfs to 19,000 cfs to define the <br />relationship. <br />Substrate analysis was accomplished with a probe. The composition <br />was verified at low flow by observation of the exposed channel and by <br />walking the cross section at shallow depths. Numerous photographic <br />analyses were made with calibrated square. These photographs were <br />evaluated with collected surface and subsurface substrate samples at <br />several cross sections on the spawning bar (Photo 1). <br />The velocity, depth, slope and substrate data was reduced and <br />presented to the USFWS for input to PHABSIM computer model. All the <br />data was prepared in standard forms and the cross section profiles were <br />all referenced to a single point assigned the arbitrary elevation value <br />of 100 feet, This data constitutes the subreach data base for eight of <br />the eleven cross sections used in the water and sediment routing model. <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br />Yampa River Canyon Morphology <br />The Yampa River canyon incised meanders are the dominant physical <br />feature in the plateau topography. This unique physical environment <br />creates a diverse biological habitat. Complex relationships exist <br />between the aquatic species and the habitat created by the river. <br />Response of the physical system to changes in flow regime would disturb <br />the stable, equilibrium conditions which support the river ecosystem. <br />The channel morphology and aquatic environment is a function of several <br />interrelated physical features of the system including geology, climate, <br />basin size, topography, sediment transport, and others. The following <br />.discussion will focus on the important aspects which define the range of <br />natural conditions and processes that exist in critical or sensitive <br />habitat reaches of the Yampa River.