Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />L <br />Table 6. Effects of Flow Reduction on the Sediment Budget in Yampa Canyon. <br />Little Snake Average Annual Flow, <br />(6 percent reduction of Hi stor i <br />Yampa River Flows FI cw Available <br />for Depletion <br />In Yampa <br />(AF) <br />399,000 AF <br />c Flows) <br />Sediment Storage <br />(Percentage of Sediment <br />Load at Mathers Hole) <br />1) Historic Flows, 1,120,000 AF 0 <br />2) NPS Minimum Streamflow <br />Hydrograph, 774,000 AF 346,000 .38.0% <br />3) NPS Minimum Streamflow <br />Hydrograph Plus Historic Flows <br />>95% of Peak FI cw s, 816,000 AF 300,000 27.0% <br />4) NPS Minimum Streamflcw <br />Hydrograph Plus Historic Flows <br />>90% of Peak FI cws, 833,000 AF 282,000 24.0% <br />5) NPS Minimum Streamf I cw <br />Hydrograph Plus Historic Flows <br />>75% of Peak FI cws, 885,000 AF 230,000 17.0% <br />6) NPS Minimum Streamfl ow <br />Hydrograph Plus Historic Flows <br />>50% of Peak Flows, 963,000 AF 152,000 9.0% <br />17