Laserfiche WebLink
37 <br />The statistic test was carried out using the Minitab statistical <br />regression computing system. The results show that there was a signifi- <br />cant difference between the rising and recessional suspended sand load, <br />the rising and recessional Helley-Smith load, and the rising and <br />recessional fine material concentration for 1983. Further, there were <br />also significant differences between 1982 and 1983 recessional total <br />suspended loads and between the 1982 and 1983 total suspended load and <br />concentration for all the measured samples (see Table VII). <br />Substantially more sediment was transported through the Yampa <br />Canyon in 1983 than in 1982. If discharge was the sole factor <br />responsible for the increase in sediment loads, then essentially no <br />differences would be detected in the sediment rating curves. The <br />results show that the Helley-Smith load is the same from year to year, <br />but variation occurs between the rising and falling limbs of the <br />hydrograph. This may be explained by the coarse sand bedload travel <br />time from the source area at Deerlodge to the Mathers Hole sampling <br />site. The concentration and fine material load are relatively less for <br />a given discharge on the falling limb than on the rising limb indicating <br />a reduction of the supply of sizes less than 0.0625 mm. The difference <br />in total suspended concentrations between 1982 and 1983 recessional <br />limbs was not significant, but the water discharge accounted for a <br />substantial difference in the total suspended load. Finally, the <br />missing rising limb measurements in 1982 may account for the difference <br />in total suspended concentration and load when compared with 1983 data. <br />The foregoing analysis demonstrates the variability of the concentration <br />and sediment load on a seasonal and annual basis. Since the sediment <br />load in the river is supply limited, large differences should be <br />expected from year to year. <br />Transported Sediment and Substrate Size Distributions <br />Throughout the Yampa Canyon the bed material size is observed as a <br />function of slope; steeper sloped reaches having boulder and cobble size <br />substrate and the milder sloped reaches, gravels and sands. The <br />upstream twenty miles, which are very steep with an average slope <br />between .0024 and .0035, have angular boulder substrate. The study <br />reach between river mile 16.5 and 20.5 has an average slope of approxi- <br />mately .0013 and a riffle-pool sequence with substrate of predominately <br />cobbles. The bed material from river mile 16.5 to the confluence with <br />the Green River, excluding Warm Springs rapid, is comprised mostly of <br />small to medium cobbles, gravels and some sand and has a slope ranging <br />from .00079 to .0011 (Figure 2). <br />The surface substrate of the cobble bars varies from the upstream <br />tip to the downstream tip of the bar. The substrate D is 100 mm for <br />the upstream portion of the RM 16.5 cobble bar and 50 mm for the down- <br />stream portion. The combined upstream and downstream substrate samples <br />is 70 mm (Figures 19-21). This corresponds well with the D size of 75 <br />mm for the cobble substrate at Mathers Hole. The porosity of the <br />cobbles is about 0.42. This is a typical value for natural grain <br />noncohesive material (standard Ottawa sand ranges from 0.33 to 0.44). <br />All of the cobble substrate material is locally derived from side canyon <br />tributaries or mass wasting processes on the talus slopes and bedrock <br />walls.