My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9612
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9612
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:02:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9612
Author
N.A.
Title
Flaming Gorge Flow Recommendation Investigation FG-1 Technical Integration and Final Report - Hydrology and Physical Science Chapter - Draft.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0 DRAFr February25, 1998 <br />For the period prior to 1963, the 1984 peak flow of 40,000 ft 3 at Jensen would have had a <br />frequency of approximately a 50-year return period flood. Using the post-1963 data base, this <br />discharge is estimated to have a return period of about 250 years (FLO Engineering, Inc., 1996). <br />For approximately the first 29 years of Green River record, until 1930, the mean annual peak <br />discharge was 39,700 W/s (excluding 6 years of missing record). The 1984 peak discharge of <br />48,300 ft /s at Green River, Utah was exceeded only seven other times during the period of <br />record and all seven times occurred before 1921. Thus, a discharge that was equaled or exceeded <br />in one third of the years of available record during the period from 1894 to 1921 has only been <br />exceeded once since 1921. This observation agrees with the results for mean annual flow prior to <br />1947 described earlier. <br />Development of water resource facilities also has played a role in the reduction of peak flows, <br />most notably Flaming Gorge Dam. After the completion of the dam, historical spring flows that <br />averaged about 7,000 ft3/s at Greendale, Utah between 1951 and 1962 were reduced to about <br />3,000 ft/s (Smith and Green, 1991). Water released from the dam for power generation has <br />ranged from 800 to 4,200 ft3/s , although a recent upgrade of the generators allows power <br />releases up to 4,950 ft3/s. The maximum power release is limited by the capacity of the turbines, <br />whereas the lower limit is set by an agreement with the State of Utah to maintain a high-quality <br />• cold-water fishery in the tailwater of the dam. An additional 4,000 ft/s can be releases through <br />steel-lined jet tubes, and 28,800 ft3/s can be discharged over the spillway. Flows greater that <br />4,950 ft/s are referred to as spills and produce no electric power (Yin et al. 1995). <br />Peak Flows - Tributary Streams <br />Streamflow records for U.S. Geological Survey gauges on six tributary streams in the Green <br />River basin were evaluated by Pick (1996) and the magnitude of flood flows for a range of <br />occurrence frequencies was determined. The gauges used in this analysis were: <br />Yampa River near Maybell, Colorado <br />Little Snake River near Lily, Colorado <br />Duchesne River near Randlett, Utah <br />White River near Watson, Utah <br />Price River at Woodside, Utah <br />San Rafeal River near Green River, Utah <br />For the stations with major upstream reservoirs, especially the Duchesne River with four upstream <br />reservoirs, no attempt was made to remove the effects of regulation from the record. Also, it was <br />assumed that log-Pearson type III was the proper distribution to be used in analysis of the flood <br />records for these gauges. The computed flows for a range of return periods are given in Table 2. <br /> <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.