Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Who pays? <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />BonnevUle also is <br />repaying past invest- <br />ments for fish ladders <br />that were installed <br />when the dams were <br />built, for salmon barg- <br />ing facilities, prid for <br />protective screens and <br />, bypass systemS at the <br />dams. <br />But this strategy rec- <br />ognizes that the dams <br />were not the only <br />cause of the salmon <br />decline. So, funding to <br />address damages not , <br />caused by the dams <br />must also be provided <br />by regional, national . <br />and local sources. . <br />We ask the states to <br />absorb some costs, <br />such as the expensel of administering neces- <br />sary changes in salmon management. In ad- <br />dition, the Endangered Species Act is federal <br />legislation, and regional actions to comply . <br />with the Act address national ~s well as re- <br />gional concerns. Federal agencies milst as- . <br />sume an appropriate share of responsibility <br />ior payirig the cost of salmon recovery. . ~ . <br /> <br />C. ongress has appropriated; approxi- <br />- . mately $100 million for 1993 Colum- <br />. bia Basin salmon rebuilding activities. <br />These appropriations will enable the Bureau <br />of Reclamation, National Marine Fisheries <br /> <br />The salmon <br />. .. . . can. . t.hr. t.ove <br />. .. without <br />hobbling our <br />economy, <br />and the <br />economy <br />can flourish <br />without <br />killing off <br />the fish. <br /> <br />.1963 <br />First nuclear power plant at the Hanford Nucleat Reser- <br />vationin Washington, ending the "aJ/-hydropowerera" <br />m~eNMhw~t . <br /> <br />We have no doubt <br />that the Northvxest can <br />make this transition, but <br />it will not come cheaply, <br />quickly or without com- <br />plications. The first <br />steps taken over the past <br />decade have already <br />cost hundreds of mil- <br />lions of dollars. Much of <br />tnat came from electric- <br />ity ratepayers. <br />In 1991, Bonneville <br />Power AdmiI\istration <br />costs to'implement the <br />Council's fish and wild- <br />life program totaled <br />approximately $110 mil- <br />lion. These costs include <br />both program projects <br />and lost power revenues from changes in the <br />,operatlon of the hydroelectric system. Esti- <br />mates of fish and wildlife program costs for <br />1993 range from $180 million to $210 mil- <br />lion, depending on the amount of revenue <br />lost when river flows are increased to <br />improve salmon survival. <br />The cost of the new ratepayer-funded <br />actions in this strategy translate into an <br />increase of about 4 percent in Bonneville <br />wholesale power rates. The increase at the , <br />retail level will vary by utility, but on aver- <br />age, the retail increase will be about 2 per- <br />cent. <br /> <br />1963 . <br />Columbia River Treaty between the United States andCanada <br />signed to coordinate water storage in the upper Columbia Basin <br />and maximize power production in the Unit~d States. <br /> <br />