My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7958
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7958
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:00:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7958
Author
Norman, R. E.
Title
Grand Valley Water Management Study
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
A Carrot Or A Hammer?, (with attachment-MOU Concerning Grand Valley Water Management Oppotunities).
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
progressive water management and likely prevent any possible river adminis- <br />tration confrontation. <br />Benefits to Other Colorado River Water Users: The water rights, diverted at <br />the Government Highline Diversion Dam, are relatively senior on the Colora- <br />do River within Colorado. Consequently, under the priority system, these <br />rights can block upstream junior water users from diverting water from the <br />river. If the amount of water which was needed to fulfill the demand of Grand <br />Valley water users could be reduced, and the water is not used to meet flow <br />need of the endangered fish, then the impact to upstream water users would be <br />diminished. <br />Some upstream junior water users enjoy the benefit of reservoir storage. <br />When the Grand Valley Project would normally block these junior water users <br />from diverting water, the junior users can request storage water. Again, by <br />reducing Grand Valley water requirements, more water could be left in storage <br />to further meet existing or future needs. <br />Benefit to the Endangered Fish: The two benefits above are common reasons <br />for more efficient water management. A unique benefit in the Grand Valley is <br />related to the location of where administrative spills return to the Colorado <br />River. As mentioned above, the laterals in the East End are not operated by <br />the GVWUA. Consequently, these laterals are not used for administrative <br />spills. In addition, the first spillway on the Government Highline Canal is <br />located at Indian Wash which flows into the Colorado River at the downstream <br />end of the 15-Mile Reach. Therefore, administrative spills at Indian Wash <br />would not benefit the flows in the 15-Mile Reach. However, if any excess <br />water were simply left in the Colorado River rather than being diverted into <br />the canal, the 15-Mile Reach would benefit. <br />The 15-Mile Reach has been labeled as important habitat for two endangered <br />fish species, the razorback sucker and the Colorado Squawfish. Desired flows <br />in this reach have been identified for recovery of the endangered fish. After <br />spring runoff the flows in the reach frequently fall below the target flows. <br />Reoperation of the Grand Valley Project could then help maintain desired <br />flows in the 15-Mile Reach. <br />HURDLES TO SUCCESS <br />Technical <br />The technical portion of the hurdles to success, that is, what improvements <br />should be made to the irrigation system and the new operational strategy, is <br />the most achievable. Since most of the canal and lateral system either has
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.